H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Marius Copil vs Leonardo Mayer H2H: 0-1

Leonardo Mayer holds a 1–0 lead over Marius Copil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leonardo Mayer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Leonardo Mayer won the 2019 Barcelona Open first round 6-3 6-7(3) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marius Copil
ROU Age 35 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Leonardo Mayer
ARG Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leonardo Mayer #63 6-3 6-7(3) 7-5 Marius Copil #80 Match data Apr 24, 2019* R64 Barcelona Open ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marius Copil #1,021 #56 888 1,810 47 81 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Leonardo Mayer #748 #21 1,605 1,938 166 194 46.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marius Copil Leonardo Mayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2009 1–1 50.0% #467 1,444 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 0–1 0.0% #291 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2011 1–2 33.3% #217 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2012 3–3 50.0% #160 1,641 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #115 1,476 0 0
22 2013 1–5 16.7% #147 1,612 0 0 2009 18–18 50.0% #75 1,664 0 0
23 2014 6–6 50.0% #172 1,696 0 0 2010 12–19 38.7% #94 1,652 0 0
24 2015 3–5 37.5% #165 1,677 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #78 1,676 0 0
25 2016 3–4 42.9% #132 1,737 0 0 2012 11–14 44.0% #71 1,726 0 0
26 2017 7–14 33.3% #93 1,674 0 0 2013 12–18 40.0% #94 1,718 0 0
27 2018 15–20 42.9% #60 1,808 0 0 2014 26–20 56.5% #28 1,832 0 1
28 2019 7–19 26.9% #153 1,706 0 0 2015 24–23 51.1% #35 1,839 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2016 9–15 37.5% #139 1,729 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2017 11–8 57.9% #52 1,796 0 2
31 2022 0–1 0.0% #374 1,569 0 0 2018 22–25 46.8% #56 1,747 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2019 16–18 47.1% #92 1,710 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2020 0–7 0.0% #135 1,605 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2021 0–1 0.0% #309 1,520 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marius Copil Leonardo Mayer
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 11 11 22 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2016 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 3 6 9 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2014 5 9 14 35.7% 18 10 28 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 2019 7 15 22 31.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 10 12 22 45.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
31 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 9 12 21 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 6 6 12 50.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 34 48 82 41.5% 7 24 31 22.6% 6 9 15 40.0% — 63 91 154 40.9% 87 84 171 50.9% 16 19 35 45.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/128 of Marius Copil's and 358/360 of Leonardo Mayer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marius Copil Leonardo Mayer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 2/2 7.0 4.5 48.8% 77.1% 50.6% 64.3% 41.1% 63.5% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1/1 4.0 3.0 50.0% 65.1% 39.5% 69.2% 75.0% 52.3% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 3/3 7.3 1.7 57.7% 72.6% 48.2% 39.3% 17.4% 62.7% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 6/6 10.8 1.8 61.8% 77.3% 52.3% 71.7% 37.0% 67.6% 35.5% 2008 2/2 7.5 3.5 52.5% 86.6% 51.5% 12.5% 33.3% 69.5% 35.8%
22 2013 6/6 9.0 3.3 56.8% 71.1% 49.4% 60.6% 21.7% 61.7% 28.3% 2009 35/36 6.6 2.6 59.4% 75.3% 53.0% 56.0% 38.7% 66.4% 37.7%
23 2014 12/12 10.5 2.0 61.0% 74.0% 52.1% 73.0% 20.2% 64.9% 31.6% 2010 31/31 6.8 3.3 61.3% 73.8% 51.3% 64.9% 46.1% 65.1% 32.4%
24 2015 8/8 12.6 3.1 55.1% 75.8% 53.4% 65.9% 41.6% 65.9% 32.6% 2011 11/11 3.1 2.8 61.4% 69.3% 55.2% 46.1% 36.0% 63.9% 32.3%
25 2016 7/7 9.6 3.4 58.2% 73.3% 55.7% 43.4% 62.7% 65.6% 36.0% 2012 25/25 6.7 4.0 59.3% 72.1% 51.5% 57.8% 37.7% 63.6% 32.1%
26 2017 21/21 10.0 3.5 56.1% 76.0% 51.6% 57.5% 35.5% 65.2% 31.5% 2013 29/30 4.7 3.7 61.7% 68.6% 50.0% 58.6% 49.2% 61.4% 34.2%
27 2018 35/35 12.8 3.3 58.9% 77.6% 55.1% 60.6% 37.3% 68.0% 32.3% 2014 46/46 6.6 4.1 59.7% 74.5% 53.7% 57.6% 42.4% 66.4% 36.4%
28 2019 26/26 11.3 3.4 57.2% 73.3% 48.8% 56.4% 35.6% 62.9% 30.3% 2015 47/47 6.7 3.0 63.8% 74.8% 54.2% 65.0% 36.3% 67.4% 35.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 24/24 4.7 3.5 61.8% 71.4% 48.5% 62.3% 38.0% 62.4% 35.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 19/19 6.7 2.7 61.7% 67.4% 53.7% 48.8% 34.0% 63.2% 34.1%
31 2022 1/1 11.0 2.0 62.8% 76.3% 57.1% 50.0% 0.0% 69.1% 26.3% 2018 47/47 6.5 3.3 61.7% 73.6% 53.2% 56.0% 38.6% 65.7% 34.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 34/34 7.9 5.0 58.3% 74.7% 53.5% 59.2% 33.6% 65.9% 34.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 7/7 5.3 6.3 58.0% 69.3% 51.3% 60.1% 27.6% 61.8% 26.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 1/1 0.0 6.0 50.8% 76.7% 37.9% 50.0% — 57.6% 24.5%
Career — 128/128 11.1 3.1 57.8% 75.2% 52.2% 59.8% 35.6% 65.3% 32.1% — 358/360 6.3 3.6 60.8% 73.0% 52.6% 58.3% 39.1% 65.1% 34.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marius Copil Leonardo Mayer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2007 1483 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1460 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1444 105.1 -0.74 -2.41 1.162 53.2% — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 1–0 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1466 107.9 -1.19 -1.58 0.779 45.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1554 115.1 +0.38 -3.10 0.938 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.06 2007 1495 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 1641 121.6 +2.57 -0.78 1.093 51.3% -2 — — 50.0% +0.07 1–1 1–1 — -0.32 2008 1476 101.9 -0.40 -0.71 1.172 51.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.01
22 2013 1613 118.9 -0.92 -2.99 0.739 45.9% — — — 21.4% -1.43 1–1 0–1 — -0.16 2009 1665 131.8 +2.06 +0.49 1.120 51.6% -73 -41 -95 54.7% +0.43 1–8 (11%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.83
23 2014 1696 129.0 +0.87 -2.43 0.901 48.2% +34 -125 — 48.1% -0.26 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.33 2010 1652 134.7 +1.36 -2.46 0.928 48.7% -71 +91 — 42.3% -0.38 4–5 (44%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.68
24 2015 1678 122.4 +0.84 -1.99 0.956 49.4% +42 — -45 42.9% -0.19 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.66 2011 1677 124.2 +0.17 -2.16 0.894 47.8% — +150 — 40.0% -0.87 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.29
25 2016 1737 124.6 +1.66 -1.66 1.047 50.6% +26 — — 50.0% -0.35 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — -0.30 2012 1726 138.2 +1.16 -3.47 0.882 48.0% -95 +90 -215 42.9% -0.59 2–3 (40%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21
26 2017 1674 138.4 +1.25 -2.84 0.905 48.3% +64 -66 — 37.0% -0.76 3–4 (43%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.06 2013 1718 135.8 -0.98 -2.09 0.885 47.8% -75 +59 -185 44.4% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.11
27 2018 1809 146.2 +2.98 -2.62 1.009 50.1% +33 -205 -181 48.2% -0.07 3–9 (25%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.13 2014 1832 147.6 +2.77 -0.26 1.083 51.2% -185 +142 -147 55.0% +0.19 8–9 (47%) 16–9 (64%) — +0.33
28 2019 1706 138.7 -0.25 -4.35 0.816 47.1% +48 -145 — 35.1% -1.07 5–7 (42%) 8–5 (62%) — -1.18 2015 1839 152.1 +2.61 -0.22 1.077 51.2% -111 +71 -78 53.4% +0.27 5–9 (36%) 16–12 (57%) — +1.37
29 2020 1665 94.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1729 141.4 -0.34 -0.34 0.955 49.2% -17 +71 — 40.7% -0.34 2–3 (40%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.17
30 2021 1582 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1797 137.1 -0.74 -0.87 0.928 48.2% -65 +75 — 57.4% +0.23 5–2 (71%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.32
31 2022 1570 106.2 -3.65 +1.03 0.851 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.07 2018 1747 152.6 +2.05 -1.29 1.007 50.3% -45 +120 -84 50.4% +0.08 8–13 (38%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.16
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1710 139.9 +1.41 -1.47 1.000 50.0% -11 +88 — 50.0% -0.13 5–9 (36%) 17–9 (65%) — +0.77
33 2024 1557 97.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1606 116.6 -1.03 -3.14 0.703 45.4% +35 +97 — 23.8% -1.52 0–4 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1520 93.3 -3.18 -4.11 0.578 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.27
Career — 1811 134.7 +1.23 -2.80 0.926 48.8% +41 -127 -136 41.5% -0.53 17–30 (36%) 39–34 (53%) 101.1 -2.13 — 1939 146.2 +1.33 -1.16 0.989 49.8% -75 +92 -125 48.7% -0.10 44–71 (38%) 106–92 (54%) 97.3 +0.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.