H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Marius Copil vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 0-1
Lukasz Kubot holds a 1–0 lead over Marius Copil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2012 Bucharest fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2012* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Lukasz Kubot | 6-3 6-3 | Marius Copil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marius Copil | #1,021 | #56 | 888 | 1,811 | 47 | 81 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marius Copil | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #147 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |