H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marius Copil vs Peter Polansky H2H: 0-1
Peter Polansky holds a 1–0 lead over Marius Copil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Polansky leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Polansky won the 2018 Indian Wells Masters first round 7-6(3) 6-7(5) 7-6(12).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2018* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Peter Polansky | 7-6(3) 6-7(5) 7-6(12) | Marius Copil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marius Copil | #1,021 | #56 | 888 | 1,811 | 47 | 81 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peter Polansky | #1,475 | #110 | 495 | 1,676 | 11 | 39 | 22.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marius Copil | Peter Polansky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #821 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #185 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #147 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #119 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |