H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marius Copil vs Ryan Harrison H2H: 1-0
Marius Copil holds a 1–0 lead over Ryan Harrison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marius Copil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marius Copil won the 2018 Basel third round 6-2 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2018* | Basel | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Marius Copil | 6-2 7-6(8) | Ryan Harrison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marius Copil | #1,021 | #56 | 888 | 1,811 | 47 | 81 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ryan Harrison | #1,551 | #40 | 1,160 | 1,893 | 117 | 155 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marius Copil | Ryan Harrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #748 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #79 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #69 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #100 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #147 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #112 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #47 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2017 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #302 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2019 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #479 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #456 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |