H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:15 UTC
Marius Copil vs Sergiy Stakhovsky
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Marius Copil vs Sergiy Stakhovsky.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marius Copil | #1,021 | #56 | 888 | 1,811 | 47 | 81 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marius Copil | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #147 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |