H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Marius Copil vs Steve Darcis H2H: 1-0

Marius Copil holds a 1–0 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marius Copil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marius Copil won the 2016 Antwerp round of 16 7-6(3) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marius Copil
ROU Age 35 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Steve Darcis
BEL Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marius Copil #198 7-6(3) 6-2 Steve Darcis #120 Match data Oct 21, 2016* R16 Antwerp ATP 250 Hard
Marius Copil #144 6-2 6-3 Steve Darcis #108 Match data Mar 20, 2013 Q1 Q Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marius Copil #1,021 #56 888 1,810 47 81 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Steve Darcis #756 #38 1,362 1,852 94 124 43.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marius Copil Steve Darcis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2009 1–1 50.0% #467 1,444 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 0–1 0.0% #291 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2011 1–2 33.3% #217 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2012 3–3 50.0% #160 1,641 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2013 1–5 16.7% #147 1,612 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #483 1,472 0 0
23 2014 6–6 50.0% #172 1,696 0 0 2007 6–2 75.0% #86 1,667 0 1
24 2015 3–5 37.5% #165 1,677 0 0 2008 20–20 50.0% #61 1,761 0 2
25 2016 3–4 42.9% #132 1,737 0 0 2009 5–18 21.7% #122 1,544 0 2
26 2017 7–14 33.3% #93 1,674 0 0 2010 4–6 40.0% #109 1,678 0 2
27 2018 15–20 42.9% #60 1,808 0 0 2011 7–6 53.8% #88 1,794 0 2
28 2019 7–19 26.9% #153 1,706 0 0 2012 19–18 51.4% #93 1,785 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2013 2–7 22.2% #164 1,717 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2014 0–1 0.0% #160 1,706 0 2
31 2022 0–1 0.0% #374 1,569 0 0 2015 8–11 42.1% #86 1,738 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2016 3–5 37.5% #86 1,773 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2017 16–18 47.1% #77 1,807 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2019 4–11 26.7% #157 1,668 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marius Copil Steve Darcis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — —
24 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2008 10 9 19 52.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2016 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 1 10 11 9.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2011 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2019 7 15 22 31.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 9 9 18 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 12 10 22 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
Career — 34 48 82 41.5% 7 24 31 22.6% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — 52 66 118 44.1% 24 38 62 38.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 2 1 3 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/128 of Marius Copil's and 209/218 of Steve Darcis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marius Copil Steve Darcis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 2/2 7.0 4.5 48.8% 77.1% 50.6% 64.3% 41.1% 63.5% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1/1 4.0 3.0 50.0% 65.1% 39.5% 69.2% 75.0% 52.3% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 3/3 7.3 1.7 57.7% 72.6% 48.2% 39.3% 17.4% 62.7% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 6/6 10.8 1.8 61.8% 77.3% 52.3% 71.7% 37.0% 67.6% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 6/6 9.0 3.3 56.8% 71.1% 49.4% 60.6% 21.7% 61.7% 28.3% 2006 1/1 2.0 3.0 53.8% 60.5% 59.5% 75.0% — 60.0% 24.5%
23 2014 12/12 10.5 2.0 61.0% 74.0% 52.1% 73.0% 20.2% 64.9% 31.6% 2007 8/8 4.4 1.9 56.6% 74.9% 49.9% 48.9% 42.3% 64.3% 41.9%
24 2015 8/8 12.6 3.1 55.1% 75.8% 53.4% 65.9% 41.6% 65.9% 32.6% 2008 39/40 4.9 1.9 60.0% 69.3% 51.1% 57.2% 42.3% 61.6% 36.0%
25 2016 7/7 9.6 3.4 58.2% 73.3% 55.7% 43.4% 62.7% 65.6% 36.0% 2009 22/23 4.5 2.3 57.6% 71.8% 50.5% 57.3% 37.5% 62.8% 34.1%
26 2017 21/21 10.0 3.5 56.1% 76.0% 51.6% 57.5% 35.5% 65.2% 31.5% 2010 10/10 3.2 1.9 60.1% 66.2% 50.4% 55.2% 46.3% 59.9% 35.6%
27 2018 35/35 12.8 3.3 58.9% 77.6% 55.1% 60.6% 37.3% 68.0% 32.3% 2011 13/13 5.2 3.8 58.6% 68.5% 48.8% 53.9% 44.7% 60.0% 37.3%
28 2019 26/26 11.3 3.4 57.2% 73.3% 48.8% 56.4% 35.6% 62.9% 30.3% 2012 33/37 4.1 1.3 63.4% 69.0% 51.7% 56.0% 41.1% 62.7% 37.1%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 8/9 4.0 2.6 62.5% 69.4% 52.7% 51.2% 30.6% 62.7% 33.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 1/1 9.0 6.0 61.3% 67.0% 58.5% 68.8% 46.2% 63.7% 37.9%
31 2022 1/1 11.0 2.0 62.8% 76.3% 57.1% 50.0% 0.0% 69.1% 26.3% 2015 18/19 2.6 2.3 62.3% 64.5% 50.0% 64.6% 38.6% 59.5% 35.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 8/8 4.5 4.3 54.5% 71.3% 52.0% 52.8% 38.9% 62.4% 36.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 33/34 3.3 1.5 61.7% 67.8% 46.8% 54.4% 44.9% 58.8% 36.9%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 15/15 3.6 1.9 62.3% 66.1% 47.3% 62.1% 36.9% 58.5% 31.7%
Career — 128/128 11.1 3.1 57.8% 75.2% 52.2% 59.8% 35.6% 65.3% 32.1% — 209/218 4.1 2.1 60.6% 68.7% 50.0% 56.7% 40.9% 61.1% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marius Copil Steve Darcis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2007 1483 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1460 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1444 105.1 -0.74 -2.41 1.162 53.2% — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 1–0 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1466 107.9 -1.19 -1.58 0.779 45.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1554 115.1 +0.38 -3.10 0.938 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 1641 121.6 +2.57 -0.78 1.093 51.3% -2 — — 50.0% +0.07 1–1 1–1 — -0.32 2005 1487 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 1613 118.9 -0.92 -2.99 0.739 45.9% — — — 21.4% -1.43 1–1 0–1 — -0.16 2006 1472 94.9 -4.72 -4.47 0.613 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.17
23 2014 1696 129.0 +0.87 -2.43 0.901 48.2% +34 -125 — 48.1% -0.26 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.33 2007 1667 133.9 +1.36 +2.37 1.174 53.0% — +39 — 66.7% +1.00 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.67
24 2015 1678 122.4 +0.84 -1.99 0.956 49.4% +42 — -45 42.9% -0.19 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.66 2008 1761 135.5 -1.36 -0.31 0.939 49.3% -35 -44 -175 50.0% -0.07 6–4 (60%) 12–5 (71%) — -0.16
25 2016 1737 124.6 +1.66 -1.66 1.047 50.6% +26 — — 50.0% -0.35 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — -0.30 2009 1545 116.6 -1.07 -1.53 0.918 48.7% +10 +55 +98 24.1% -1.26 1–4 (20%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.42
26 2017 1674 138.4 +1.25 -2.84 0.905 48.3% +64 -66 — 37.0% -0.76 3–4 (43%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.06 2010 1678 128.9 -1.59 -0.51 0.889 48.2% +4 -43 — 52.6% +0.26 0–1 — — -0.11
27 2018 1809 146.2 +2.98 -2.62 1.009 50.1% +33 -205 -181 48.2% -0.07 3–9 (25%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.13 2011 1795 125.8 -2.07 -0.57 0.934 48.6% -43 -55 — 47.4% -0.03 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.14
28 2019 1706 138.7 -0.25 -4.35 0.816 47.1% +48 -145 — 35.1% -1.07 5–7 (42%) 8–5 (62%) — -1.18 2012 1786 143.8 -0.59 +0.30 0.994 50.0% -43 -40 -50 54.4% -0.01 7–8 (47%) 16–3 (84%) — -2.70
29 2020 1665 94.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1717 114.5 -0.61 -0.45 0.898 48.1% -62 — +57 33.3% -1.05 0–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.52
30 2021 1582 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1706 110.7 +1.34 +0.22 1.043 51.1% — — — 40.0% +0.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.14
31 2022 1570 106.2 -3.65 +1.03 0.851 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.07 2015 1739 139.6 -2.44 0.00 0.871 47.8% +50 -47 — 43.2% -0.60 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -1.13
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1773 129.3 -0.69 +1.36 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 40.7% -0.33 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.32
33 2024 1557 97.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1807 136.2 -3.10 +0.27 0.897 47.9% +17 -72 -137 48.1% -0.27 4–3 (57%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.06
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1669 114.6 -4.04 -3.13 0.764 45.3% +41 — +47 32.4% -1.27 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.76
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1648 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1811 134.7 +1.23 -2.80 0.926 48.8% +41 -127 -136 41.5% -0.53 17–30 (36%) 39–34 (53%) 101.1 -2.13 — 1852 137.3 -1.67 -0.31 0.923 48.7% -5 -28 -35 45.2% -0.33 29–29 (50%) 46–35 (57%) 105.6 -2.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.