H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Cox vs Phil Dent H2H: 4-1
Mark Cox holds a 4–1 lead over Phil Dent in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mark Cox leads 3–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Cox won the 1978 Memphis fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 76
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1978* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mark Cox | 6-1 6-1 | Phil Dent | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1977* | Palm Springs | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Phil Dent | 6-1 6-0 | Mark Cox | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1975* | Memphis | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Mark Cox | 6-1 6-1 | Phil Dent | Match data |
| Oct 26, 1972* | Vancouver Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mark Cox | 6-3 6-4 | Phil Dent | Match data |
| Aug 20, 1970* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mark Cox | 6-2 1-6 8-6 6-0 | Phil Dent | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Cox | Phil Dent | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 24–22 | 52.2% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 28–33 | 45.9% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 5–22 | 18.5% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 38–31 | 55.1% | #49 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #41 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 42–27 | 60.9% | #33 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #37 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 59–29 | 67.0% | #22 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #87 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #50 | 1,853 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #34 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 | 1981 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #65 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 | 1982 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #57 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | 1983 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #100 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |