H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Cox vs Robert Maud H2H: 3-1
Mark Cox holds a 3–1 lead over Robert Maud in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mark Cox leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Cox won the 1972 Alamo Wct third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 83
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
RSA
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 1972* | Alamo Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mark Cox | 6-2 6-4 | Robert Maud | Match data |
| Apr 29, 1970* | Bournemouth | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mark Cox | 4-6 8-6 6-0 6-1 | Robert Maud | Match data |
| May 1, 1969* | Bournemouth | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mark Cox | 6-3 6-0 1-6 0-6 6-4 | Robert Maud | Match data |
| Jan 6, 1968* | Cape Town | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Robert Maud | 6-4 6-2 | Mark Cox | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Cox | #486 | #12 | 0 | 2,009 | 408 | 274 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| Robert Maud | #326 | #57 | 0 | 1,804 | 123 | 131 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Cox | Robert Maud | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 29–11 | 72.5% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 21–10 | 67.7% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1968 | 52–23 | 69.3% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 22–31 | 41.5% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1969 | 35–16 | 68.6% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 6–26 | 18.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1970 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #73 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1971 | 27–31 | 46.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #62 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1972 | 43–29 | 59.7% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #178 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1973 | 56–28 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,890 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1974 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #25 | 1,915 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1976 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,954 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1977 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #26 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,765 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #76 | 1,786 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #140 | 1,673 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,597 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |