H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Edmondson vs Rod Frawley H2H: 1-2
Rod Frawley holds a 2–1 lead over Mark Edmondson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Rod Frawley leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Rod Frawley won the 1982 Frankfurt fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 73
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 1982* | Frankfurt | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Rod Frawley | 6-4 6-4 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1981* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Mark Edmondson | 3-6 6-3 7-6 | Rod Frawley | Match data |
| Oct 11, 1980* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Rod Frawley | 5-7 7-6 6-3 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Rod Frawley | #483 | #43 | 0 | 1,812 | 112 | 145 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Edmondson | Rod Frawley | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 | 1977 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #173 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 | 1978 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #142 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 | 1979 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #86 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 | 1980 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #44 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 | 1981 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #89 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #87 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 | 1983 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #100 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |