H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Mark Edmondson vs Rod Frawley H2H: 1-2

Rod Frawley holds a 2–1 lead over Mark Edmondson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Rod Frawley leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Rod Frawley won the 1982 Frankfurt round of 16 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Edmondson
AUS Age 72 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Rod Frawley
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rod Frawley #50 6-4 6-4 Mark Edmondson #20 Match data Apr 2, 1982* R16 Frankfurt ATP 250 Carpet
Mark Edmondson #56 3-6 6-3 7-6 Rod Frawley #67 Match data Oct 10, 1981* SF Brisbane International ATP 250 Grass
Rod Frawley #56 5-7 7-6 6-3 Mark Edmondson #70 Match data Oct 11, 1980* QF Brisbane International ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Edmondson #525 #15 0 1,927 244 231 51.4% 1 0 0 0 5 6
Rod Frawley #483 #43 0 1,814 112 143 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Edmondson Rod Frawley
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 1–2 33.3% — 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 0–2 0.0% — 1,448 0 0
18 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0 1971 3–5 37.5% — 1,435 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1972 4–6 40.0% — 1,460 0 0
20 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1975 2–4 33.3% #212 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1976 42–29 59.2% #35 1,755 1 2 — — — — — — —
23 1977 16–24 40.0% #92 1,602 1 2 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,478 0 0
24 1978 15–16 48.4% #79 1,685 1 3 1977 3–10 23.1% #207 1,419 0 0
25 1979 26–26 50.0% #95 1,742 1 3 1978 7–15 31.8% #142 1,505 0 0
26 1980 18–23 43.9% #91 1,715 1 3 1979 11–15 42.3% #86 1,583 0 0
27 1981 59–26 69.4% #23 1,902 1 6 1980 29–23 55.8% #44 1,774 0 0
28 1982 27–25 51.9% #18 1,708 1 6 1981 20–24 45.5% #89 1,752 0 0
29 1983 16–17 48.5% #37 1,687 1 6 1982 22–23 48.9% #87 1,686 0 1
30 1984 9–18 33.3% #145 1,573 1 6 1983 10–14 41.7% #100 1,597 0 1
31 1985 9–10 47.4% #115 1,595 1 6 1984 1–3 25.0% #385 1,576 0 1
32 1986 3–9 25.0% #307 1,539 1 6 — — — — — — —
33 1987 1–1 50.0% #523 1,550 1 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Edmondson Rod Frawley
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 1972 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
20 1974 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1976 8 4 12 66.7% 19 20 39 48.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1977 3 5 8 37.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1976 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1978 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1979 4 5 9 44.4% 5 9 14 35.7% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1978 — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1980 4 5 9 44.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1979 5 8 13 38.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1981 14 8 22 63.6% 9 9 18 50.0% 25 4 29 86.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 1980 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
28 1982 5 6 11 45.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 11 6 17 64.7% 8 8 16 50.0% 1981 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 9 13 30.8%
29 1983 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 14 8 22 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 1984 1 7 8 12.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1983 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
32 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1987 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 50 58 108 46.3% 59 76 135 43.7% 102 58 160 63.8% 33 39 72 45.8% — 24 35 59 40.7% 17 28 45 37.8% 56 51 107 52.3% 15 29 44 34.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Edmondson Rod Frawley
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1480 94.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.12
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1448 91.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.20
18 1972 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.13 1971 1435 97.3 — — — — +44 — +62 31.6% -1.11 — 0–2 — +0.93
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1461 104.7 — — — — +33 — +47 45.8% -0.46 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 100.1 +0.88
20 1974 1489 104.0 — — — — — — +36 42.9% -0.72 0–1 1–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1975 1501 106.2 — — — — — — +36 42.9% -0.67 1–1 0–1 — +0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1976 1756 137.6 — — — — -128 -137 +160 56.1% +0.33 14–13 (52%) 18–8 (69%) 111.1 +4.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1977 1603 131.0 — — — — -25 +7 +221 47.7% +0.01 4–13 (24%) 3–4 (43%) 91.2 +1.28 1976 1478 107.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–0 — +0.07
24 1978 1686 136.0 — — — — -115 -93 +199 47.3% -0.14 4–2 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 -0.12 1977 1419 104.2 — — — — +46 — +53 28.1% -1.53 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +1.55
25 1979 1743 144.3 — — — — -89 -149 +141 51.5% +0.13 7–10 (41%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 -0.24 1978 1506 130.8 — — — — — +23 +24 33.9% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 101.3 -0.84
26 1980 1715 129.3 — — — — -68 -118 +111 46.5% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 101.8 -1.75 1979 1584 123.2 — — — — -108 -25 -1 47.2% -0.06 5–8 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 98.7 +1.69
27 1981 1902 144.4 — — — — -56 -267 +89 62.4% +0.73 23–9 (72%) 20–5 (80%) 117.8 +2.48 1980 1775 142.4 — — — — -97 -151 -51 53.8% +0.06 13–9 (59%) 14–6 (70%) 114.9 -0.59
28 1982 1709 130.9 — — — — +33 -109 +214 51.2% -0.06 5–5 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 98.0 +0.35 1981 1752 129.5 — — — — -133 -186 +83 47.1% -0.15 8–8 (50%) 10–10 (50%) 102.3 +0.07
29 1983 1688 128.5 — — — — +28 -69 +179 48.2% -0.14 7–3 (70%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 +0.63 1982 1687 132.2 — — — — -50 -111 +112 47.0% -0.50 11–6 (65%) 13–6 (68%) 109.6 -1.34
30 1984 1573 121.2 — — — — -16 +69 +224 39.1% -0.94 2–5 (29%) 5–5 (50%) 94.5 -0.75 1983 1597 116.8 — — — — +21 0 +66 44.1% -0.39 3–5 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 +1.26
31 1985 1595 118.9 — — — — — +47 +142 42.9% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 3–7 (30%) 98.3 +0.58 1984 1577 104.3 — — — — +18 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 0–2 — +0.45
32 1986 1540 111.0 — — — — -29 — +155 30.0% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.4 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1987 1550 100.5 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1927 139.1 — — — — -40 -114 +151 50.9% +0.02 81–74 (52%) 86–63 (58%) 105.9 +1.57 — 1815 131.3 — — — — -67 -74 +48 44.8% -0.43 45–44 (51%) 51–41 (55%) 109.6 +1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.