H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mark Edmondson vs Zeljko Franulovic H2H: 1-1
Mark Edmondson and Zeljko Franulovic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zeljko Franulovic leads 1–0 on clay, while Mark Edmondson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Edmondson won the 1981 Linz fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1981* | Linz | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mark Edmondson | 6-2 6-2 | Zeljko Franulovic | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1976* | North Conway | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Zeljko Franulovic | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Zeljko Franulovic | #616 | #30 | 0 | 2,014 | 407 | 307 | 57.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Edmondson | Zeljko Franulovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 | 1969 | 47–20 | 70.1% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 | 1970 | 64–29 | 68.8% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 | 1971 | 59–28 | 67.8% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 | 1972 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 | 1973 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #70 | 1,706 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 | 1974 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #77 | 1,657 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 | 1975 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,747 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 | 1976 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #44 | 1,916 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 | 1977 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #42 | 1,762 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 | 1978 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 | 1979 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,768 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 | 1980 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,678 | 0 | 13 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #100 | 1,648 | 0 | 13 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,616 | 0 | 13 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,567 | 0 | 13 |