H2H data updated: 2026-07-15 14:15 UTC
Mark Knowles vs Marcelo Filippini H2H: 1-0
Mark Knowles holds a 1–0 lead over Marcelo Filippini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Knowles leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Knowles won the 1996 US Open first round 6-3 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BAH
Age 54
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
URU
Age 58
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mark Knowles | 6-3 7-5 6-1 | Marcelo Filippini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Knowles | #1,400 | #96 | 484 | 1,623 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marcelo Filippini | #967 | #30 | 971 | 1,799 | 217 | 229 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Knowles | Marcelo Filippini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #291 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #118 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #49 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #107 | 1,528 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #60 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #87 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #60 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,674 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #81 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #44 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #135 | 1,592 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,586 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #775 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |