H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs Alex Corretja H2H: 2-1
Mark Philippoussis holds a 2–1 lead over Alex Corretja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 1999 Indian Wells Masters third round 4-6 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 1999* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 4-6 7-5 6-2 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1998 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
| May 4, 1997* | Munich | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Mark Philippoussis | 7-6(3) 1-6 6-4 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Alex Corretja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 |