H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Mark Philippoussis vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 1-1

Mark Philippoussis and Daniel Vacek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on carpet, while Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 1998 Paris Masters round of 64 7-6(5) 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Philippoussis
AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Daniel Vacek
CZE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Philippoussis #18 7-6(5) 7-6(6) Daniel Vacek #43 Match data Nov 4, 1998* R64 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Daniel Vacek #83 7-6(4) 7-5 6-2 Mark Philippoussis #19 Match data Aug 31, 1997* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,010 291 193 60.1% 0 1 0 2 8 11
Daniel Vacek #1,133 #26 1,151 1,821 171 220 43.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Philippoussis Daniel Vacek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,765 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1996 33–23 58.9% #30 1,840 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,854 0 4 1991 1–3 25.0% #470 1,490 0 0
21 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,908 0 5 — — — — — — —
22 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,890 0 7 1993 13–22 37.1% #114 1,559 0 0
23 2000 42–22 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8 1994 25–27 48.1% #45 1,732 0 0
24 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,804 0 9 1995 30–31 49.2% #27 1,797 0 0
25 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9 1996 23–29 44.2% #71 1,692 0 0
26 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10 1997 19–26 42.2% #53 1,669 0 0
27 2004 8–16 33.3% #109 1,649 0 10 1998 25–29 46.3% #50 1,671 0 0
28 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,655 0 10 1999 29–31 48.3% #43 1,740 0 0
29 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,731 0 11 2000 4–13 23.5% #238 1,628 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2001 2–7 22.2% #393 1,595 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2002 0–2 0.0% #749 1,577 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Philippoussis Daniel Vacek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 25 12 37 67.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 20 9 29 69.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1998 20 11 31 64.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 20 7 27 74.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 7 9 16 43.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 2000 28 13 41 68.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 1994 10 11 21 47.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3%
24 2001 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 11 11 22 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 14 10 24 58.3%
25 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1996 10 11 21 47.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
26 2003 24 12 36 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 6 11 17 35.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
27 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1998 17 17 34 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
28 2005 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 20 17 37 54.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 2006 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 178 115 293 60.8% 35 35 70 50.0% 48 22 70 68.6% 30 21 51 58.8% — 87 105 192 45.3% 22 42 64 34.4% 17 23 40 42.5% 45 50 95 47.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 422/484 of Mark Philippoussis's and 346/391 of Daniel Vacek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mark Philippoussis Daniel Vacek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1994 4/4 6.0 4.0 58.1% 64.9% 40.4% 42.4% 25.4% 54.8% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 41/42 11.9 4.9 58.5% 79.7% 48.8% 70.4% 41.4% 66.6% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 45/56 14.1 5.9 59.0% 81.0% 47.5% 63.5% 37.3% 67.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 56/61 13.8 5.6 58.7% 79.5% 51.7% 61.7% 42.5% 68.0% 32.9% 1991 4/4 3.8 2.8 61.6% 71.4% 42.5% 43.4% 19.0% 59.1% 34.1%
21 1998 41/50 12.6 5.0 58.5% 78.7% 49.7% 59.9% 40.0% 66.8% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 33/45 14.3 4.8 57.4% 80.6% 49.5% 63.7% 39.4% 67.4% 34.9% 1993 32/35 6.8 4.4 60.0% 72.6% 54.6% 58.6% 34.4% 65.5% 31.8%
23 2000 49/64 15.6 5.5 56.0% 81.4% 52.4% 59.2% 40.4% 68.7% 34.9% 1994 49/52 7.0 5.4 59.5% 74.6% 50.5% 56.6% 36.0% 65.1% 34.7%
24 2001 16/18 16.4 3.8 56.8% 79.7% 51.0% 64.7% 34.2% 67.4% 35.1% 1995 50/61 8.1 4.3 59.9% 75.7% 51.4% 61.3% 37.4% 65.9% 35.7%
25 2002 24/28 16.2 6.6 55.5% 79.7% 53.3% 64.7% 46.2% 67.8% 35.4% 1996 48/52 7.3 5.1 56.7% 76.2% 49.0% 53.1% 39.3% 64.6% 33.5%
26 2003 51/52 14.7 4.9 56.1% 79.7% 50.9% 65.8% 51.6% 67.1% 34.4% 1997 41/45 8.2 6.8 51.8% 76.0% 46.0% 59.0% 36.2% 61.5% 34.9%
27 2004 23/24 12.5 5.3 56.8% 77.3% 45.9% 57.2% 39.6% 63.7% 33.2% 1998 46/54 7.0 5.1 56.6% 74.9% 47.3% 61.9% 39.4% 62.8% 35.5%
28 2005 19/20 12.2 4.5 62.8% 77.2% 49.4% 56.6% 34.3% 66.7% 31.2% 1999 50/60 4.7 4.6 56.5% 70.1% 47.7% 64.0% 37.1% 60.1% 36.2%
29 2006 20/20 14.0 4.9 55.3% 79.7% 48.8% 59.4% 34.5% 66.0% 33.4% 2000 15/17 4.2 5.4 53.6% 64.8% 40.6% 42.9% 30.9% 53.9% 30.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 9/9 6.8 3.4 54.2% 67.3% 50.2% 50.6% 27.2% 59.5% 29.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 2/2 5.0 2.5 58.4% 71.8% 37.5% 45.7% 36.5% 57.6% 36.6%
Career — 422/484 13.9 5.2 57.6% 79.6% 50.0% 62.5% 41.0% 67.0% 34.7% — 346/391 6.8 5.0 57.1% 73.7% 48.8% 58.1% 36.5% 63.0% 34.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Philippoussis Daniel Vacek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1492 104.4 -1.87 -2.04 0.773 44.9% +22 — — 20.0% -2.10 1–0 — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1766 149.6 +4.26 -1.00 1.098 51.6% +23 -186 -194 55.4% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 13–11 (54%) — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1840 149.6 +4.59 -0.57 1.113 52.1% +22 -218 -226 57.1% +0.49 9–7 (56%) 19–13 (59%) — +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1854 146.5 +5.16 -3.42 1.028 50.7% -13 -55 -123 60.3% +0.36 17–3 (85%) 23–13 (64%) — -0.04 1991 1490 102.2 -1.04 -0.09 0.834 46.2% — — — 22.2% -1.67 — 1–0 — +0.10
21 1998 1908 152.3 +4.61 -1.16 1.069 51.2% -5 -126 -84 60.1% +0.49 7–9 (44%) 14–12 (54%) — -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 1890 149.4 +4.70 -0.77 1.068 51.3% +38 -161 -21 61.6% +0.54 12–10 (55%) 16–11 (59%) — -1.51 1993 1560 126.4 +2.79 -4.51 0.922 49.1% -2 +9 -4 41.1% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.29
23 2000 1895 148.6 +5.41 -1.43 1.113 51.6% +21 -144 +61 60.9% +0.61 14–8 (64%) 26–20 (57%) — -0.59 1994 1732 143.4 +3.08 -2.24 0.992 49.9% -14 -131 -90 47.5% -0.12 12–9 (57%) 13–15 (46%) — -1.41
24 2001 1804 130.5 +3.11 -1.38 1.076 51.5% +5 — — 58.7% +0.48 3–7 (30%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.83 1995 1798 148.9 +3.89 -1.17 1.046 50.7% +14 -171 -195 48.7% +0.03 10–11 (48%) 15–18 (45%) — -1.99
25 2002 1772 147.8 +3.64 -0.25 1.099 51.6% +15 -59 +179 50.0% +0.35 5–3 (63%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.36 1996 1692 140.7 +2.32 -3.52 0.945 49.3% +10 -77 -50 45.5% -0.25 12–11 (52%) 14–11 (56%) — -2.02
26 2003 1882 149.2 +4.49 -1.14 1.047 50.9% -35 -127 +200 60.7% +0.48 10–4 (71%) 17–12 (59%) — -2.84 1997 1670 134.8 -0.60 -1.91 0.906 48.1% +38 -50 -60 41.8% -0.61 6–7 (46%) 13–12 (52%) — -0.33
27 2004 1650 118.2 +0.10 -2.14 0.915 48.5% -8 +49 +352 41.5% -0.52 2–4 (33%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.80 1998 1672 143.3 +0.67 -1.11 0.956 49.4% +16 -20 -40 48.1% -0.21 6–8 (43%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.31
28 2005 1656 122.6 +1.88 -3.91 0.939 49.2% -52 — +334 48.9% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.33 1999 1741 133.9 -1.09 -1.27 0.909 48.6% +1 -191 -65 46.2% -0.17 9–4 (69%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.89
29 2006 1732 128.9 +2.70 -1.85 0.984 49.8% -151 — +285 49.1% -0.04 5–2 (71%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.13 2000 1629 122.6 -4.37 -4.38 0.659 42.4% +53 -125 — 27.5% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) — -1.16
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1595 122.1 -0.70 -2.81 0.721 45.3% +49 — — 23.8% -1.67 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.96
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1578 111.7 +0.38 -0.21 0.865 46.5% — — — 16.7% -1.17 — 0–2 — -0.38
38 2015 1708 98.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2011 151.8 +4.10 -1.55 1.052 50.9% 0 -124 +113 57.0% +0.37 96–66 (59%) 158–135 (54%) 104.5 -1.58 — 1822 143.7 +1.22 -2.21 0.930 48.9% +12 -96 -70 44.3% -0.37 59–59 (50%) 88–91 (49%) 102.9 -1.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.