H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs David Wheaton H2H: 0-1
David Wheaton holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Philippoussis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Wheaton leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Wheaton won the 1997 New Haven third round 6-7(2) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1997* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Wheaton | 6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| David Wheaton | #874 | #12 | 1,506 | 1,984 | 231 | 190 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | David Wheaton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #785 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #345 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #27 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #39 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #131 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #148 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | 1998 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #229 | 1,620 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,582 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #313 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 |