Mark Philippoussis
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 31, 2000 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 1, 2003 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jul 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jun 11, 2003 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
David Wheaton holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Philippoussis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Wheaton leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Wheaton won the 1997 New Haven round of 32 6-7(2) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Wheaton | 6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data | Aug 14, 1997* | R32 | New Haven | Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,010 | 291 | 193 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 11 |
| David Wheaton | #874 | #12 | 1,506 | 1,985 | 231 | 190 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | David Wheaton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #785 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #345 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #30 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,854 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,908 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,957 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #44 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,804 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #39 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,649 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #131 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,655 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #148 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,731 | 0 | 11 | 1998 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #229 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #313 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | David Wheaton | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1994 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 1987 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 25 | 12 | 37 | 67.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1988 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 20 | 9 | 29 | 69.0% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1989 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 21 | 1998 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1990 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1999 | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1991 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 2000 | 28 | 13 | 41 | 68.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1992 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 24 | 2001 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1993 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 25 | 2002 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 26 | 2003 | 24 | 12 | 36 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1995 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 27 | 2004 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2005 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1997 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 2006 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 178 | 115 | 293 | 60.8% | 35 | 35 | 70 | 50.0% | 48 | 22 | 70 | 68.6% | 30 | 21 | 51 | 58.8% | — | 125 | 101 | 226 | 55.3% | 30 | 27 | 57 | 52.6% | 48 | 27 | 75 | 64.0% | 28 | 35 | 63 | 44.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 422/484 of Mark Philippoussis's and 269/322 of David Wheaton's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | David Wheaton | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 1994 | 4/4 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 58.1% | 64.9% | 40.4% | 42.4% | 25.4% | 54.8% | 35.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 41/42 | 11.9 | 4.9 | 58.5% | 79.7% | 48.8% | 70.4% | 41.4% | 66.6% | 36.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 45/56 | 14.1 | 5.9 | 59.0% | 81.0% | 47.5% | 63.5% | 37.3% | 67.2% | 36.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 56/61 | 13.8 | 5.6 | 58.7% | 79.5% | 51.7% | 61.7% | 42.5% | 68.0% | 32.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 41/50 | 12.6 | 5.0 | 58.5% | 78.7% | 49.7% | 59.9% | 40.0% | 66.8% | 35.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 33/45 | 14.3 | 4.8 | 57.4% | 80.6% | 49.5% | 63.7% | 39.4% | 67.4% | 34.9% | 1991 | 41/52 | 7.4 | 3.9 | 60.4% | 72.9% | 49.6% | 65.8% | 35.4% | 63.6% | 38.3% |
| 23 | 2000 | 49/64 | 15.6 | 5.5 | 56.0% | 81.4% | 52.4% | 59.2% | 40.4% | 68.7% | 34.9% | 1992 | 48/53 | 8.1 | 5.7 | 56.1% | 75.9% | 47.9% | 59.7% | 43.5% | 63.6% | 36.8% |
| 24 | 2001 | 16/18 | 16.4 | 3.8 | 56.8% | 79.7% | 51.0% | 64.7% | 34.2% | 67.4% | 35.1% | 1993 | 43/52 | 8.0 | 5.4 | 58.1% | 72.7% | 47.6% | 55.1% | 46.0% | 62.2% | 37.9% |
| 25 | 2002 | 24/28 | 16.2 | 6.6 | 55.5% | 79.7% | 53.3% | 64.7% | 46.2% | 67.8% | 35.4% | 1994 | 39/46 | 9.8 | 4.0 | 59.4% | 75.5% | 49.4% | 64.3% | 40.8% | 64.9% | 37.4% |
| 26 | 2003 | 51/52 | 14.7 | 4.9 | 56.1% | 79.7% | 50.9% | 65.8% | 51.6% | 67.1% | 34.4% | 1995 | 42/52 | 6.9 | 2.4 | 65.8% | 72.8% | 51.7% | 57.0% | 44.9% | 65.4% | 38.0% |
| 27 | 2004 | 23/24 | 12.5 | 5.3 | 56.8% | 77.3% | 45.9% | 57.2% | 39.6% | 63.7% | 33.2% | 1996 | 22/27 | 8.9 | 4.1 | 58.2% | 74.3% | 48.1% | 47.5% | 42.4% | 63.3% | 37.2% |
| 28 | 2005 | 19/20 | 12.2 | 4.5 | 62.8% | 77.2% | 49.4% | 56.6% | 34.3% | 66.7% | 31.2% | 1997 | 17/18 | 5.5 | 3.2 | 63.6% | 68.5% | 47.3% | 57.7% | 41.2% | 60.8% | 37.4% |
| 29 | 2006 | 20/20 | 14.0 | 4.9 | 55.3% | 79.7% | 48.8% | 59.4% | 34.5% | 66.0% | 33.4% | 1998 | 11/16 | 6.9 | 5.7 | 59.8% | 71.2% | 49.8% | 59.6% | 34.1% | 62.4% | 37.7% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2/2 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 58.3% | 70.1% | 31.3% | 61.1% | 16.7% | 53.8% | 27.1% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4/4 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 56.0% | 74.3% | 53.6% | 62.8% | 55.6% | 65.0% | 34.3% |
| Career | — | 422/484 | 13.9 | 5.2 | 57.6% | 79.6% | 50.0% | 62.5% | 41.0% | 67.0% | 34.7% | — | 269/421 | 7.8 | 4.3 | 59.9% | 73.5% | 48.9% | 59.1% | 41.8% | 63.5% | 37.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | David Wheaton | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1492 | 104.4 | -1.87 | -2.04 | 0.773 | 44.9% | +22 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.10 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.05 | 1986 | 1493 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.05 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1766 | 149.6 | +4.26 | -1.00 | 1.098 | 51.6% | +23 | -186 | -194 | 55.4% | +0.51 | 9–5 (64%) | 13–11 (54%) | — | -0.34 | 1987 | 1525 | 127.6 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 47.1% | +0.06 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | -0.15 |
| 19 | 1996 | 1840 | 149.6 | +4.59 | -0.57 | 1.113 | 52.1% | +22 | -218 | -226 | 57.1% | +0.49 | 9–7 (56%) | 19–13 (59%) | — | +1.05 | 1988 | 1494 | 102.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.14 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.14 |
| 20 | 1997 | 1854 | 146.5 | +5.16 | -3.42 | 1.028 | 50.7% | -13 | -55 | -123 | 60.3% | +0.36 | 17–3 (85%) | 23–13 (64%) | — | -0.04 | 1989 | 1684 | 136.0 | — | — | — | — | +1 | — | -144 | 50.0% | +0.06 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–14 (30%) | — | -1.35 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1908 | 152.3 | +4.61 | -1.16 | 1.069 | 51.2% | -5 | -126 | -84 | 60.1% | +0.49 | 7–9 (44%) | 14–12 (54%) | — | -1.16 | 1990 | 1874 | 150.4 | — | — | — | — | -5 | -289 | -180 | 58.9% | +0.60 | 13–7 (65%) | 12–15 (44%) | — | -1.34 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1890 | 149.4 | +4.70 | -0.77 | 1.068 | 51.3% | +38 | -161 | -21 | 61.6% | +0.54 | 12–10 (55%) | 16–11 (59%) | — | -1.51 | 1991 | 1957 | 156.3 | +2.86 | +1.19 | 1.052 | 50.9% | -13 | -360 | -71 | 60.0% | +0.56 | 8–7 (53%) | 15–9 (63%) | — | -4.05 |
| 23 | 2000 | 1895 | 148.6 | +5.41 | -1.43 | 1.113 | 51.6% | +21 | -144 | +61 | 60.9% | +0.61 | 14–8 (64%) | 26–20 (57%) | — | -0.59 | 1992 | 1806 | 145.3 | +1.33 | -0.69 | 1.009 | 50.2% | +44 | -202 | +66 | 53.1% | +0.22 | 13–6 (68%) | 13–12 (52%) | — | +0.32 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1804 | 130.5 | +3.11 | -1.38 | 1.076 | 51.5% | +5 | — | — | 58.7% | +0.48 | 3–7 (30%) | 5–7 (42%) | — | +0.83 | 1993 | 1730 | 145.2 | +0.85 | +0.44 | 1.001 | 50.1% | +8 | -96 | +174 | 51.4% | +0.23 | 11–10 (52%) | 11–8 (58%) | — | -1.90 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1772 | 147.8 | +3.64 | -0.25 | 1.099 | 51.6% | +15 | -59 | +179 | 50.0% | +0.35 | 5–3 (63%) | 8–16 (33%) | — | -2.36 | 1994 | 1783 | 150.7 | +2.86 | +0.69 | 1.065 | 51.0% | -7 | — | +170 | 56.4% | +0.39 | 12–9 (57%) | 13–10 (57%) | — | -1.67 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1882 | 149.2 | +4.49 | -1.14 | 1.047 | 50.9% | -35 | -127 | +200 | 60.7% | +0.48 | 10–4 (71%) | 17–12 (59%) | — | -2.84 | 1995 | 1705 | 138.8 | +3.53 | +0.28 | 1.099 | 51.9% | -14 | +18 | +177 | 55.1% | +0.37 | 5–9 (36%) | 11–11 (50%) | — | +0.22 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1650 | 118.2 | +0.10 | -2.14 | 0.915 | 48.5% | -8 | +49 | +352 | 41.5% | -0.52 | 2–4 (33%) | 5–9 (36%) | — | +0.80 | 1996 | 1704 | 124.8 | +0.59 | -0.15 | 1.012 | 50.4% | -10 | -36 | +158 | 50.0% | +0.08 | 2–5 (29%) | 8–3 (73%) | — | +0.53 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1656 | 122.6 | +1.88 | -3.91 | 0.939 | 49.2% | -52 | — | +334 | 48.9% | -0.15 | 2–4 (33%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | -0.33 | 1997 | 1706 | 125.0 | -1.29 | +0.95 | 0.954 | 49.2% | -17 | — | +152 | 50.0% | -0.10 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–4 (60%) | — | +0.20 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1732 | 128.9 | +2.70 | -1.85 | 0.984 | 49.8% | -151 | — | +285 | 49.1% | -0.04 | 5–2 (71%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | -1.13 | 1998 | 1622 | 114.8 | +0.55 | -0.28 | 1.004 | 49.9% | +11 | — | +165 | 39.0% | -0.56 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–4 (20%) | — | +0.22 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1584 | 95.4 | -2.29 | -2.68 | 0.587 | 41.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.26 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1563 | 101.9 | +1.95 | -0.92 | 0.979 | 50.4% | — | — | — | 33.3% | +0.11 | 0–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.27 |
| 38 | 2015 | 1708 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2011 | 151.8 | +4.10 | -1.55 | 1.052 | 50.9% | 0 | -124 | +113 | 57.0% | +0.37 | 96–66 (59%) | 158–135 (54%) | 104.5 | -1.58 | — | 1986 | 148.6 | +1.78 | +0.28 | 1.027 | 50.5% | +2 | -132 | +57 | 53.2% | +0.25 | 81–70 (54%) | 98–93 (51%) | 101.8 | -2.18 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 31, 2000 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 1, 2003 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jul 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jun 11, 2003 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | 6 | 5 | 11 | Nov 3, 1994 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 3 | 6 | 9 | Jul 23, 1998 | H2H |
| Jason Stoltenberg | 4 | 4 | 8 | Jul 18, 1997 | H2H |
| Todd Martin | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 25, 1995 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 11, 1994 | H2H |