H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mark Philippoussis vs Tim Henman H2H: 4-3

Mark Philippoussis holds a 4–3 lead over Tim Henman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Mark Philippoussis leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2004 Wimbledon fourth round 6-2 7-5 6-7(3) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Philippoussis
AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Tim Henman #6 6-2 7-5 6-7(3) 7-6(5) Mark Philippoussis #17 Match data
Jan 6, 2002* Adelaide ATP 250 F Hard Tim Henman #9 6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 Mark Philippoussis #104 Match data
Jul 5, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Mark Philippoussis #18 6-1 5-7 6-7(9) 6-3 6-4 Tim Henman #14 Match data
Nov 6, 1999* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Mark Philippoussis #22 6-1 3-6 6-3 Tim Henman #10 Match data
Sep 9, 1998* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Mark Philippoussis #22 7-5 0-6 6-4 6-1 Tim Henman #13 Match data
Oct 4, 1997* Basel ATP 250 SF Carpet Mark Philippoussis #21 7-6(2) 6-4 Tim Henman #20 Match data
Jan 11, 1996* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Hard Tim Henman #95 6-4 6-2 Mark Philippoussis #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,022 287 190 60.2% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Philippoussis Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,764 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1996 31–22 58.5% #30 1,838 0 1 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,852 0 4 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,906 0 5 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,892 0 7 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2000 40–21 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,803 0 9 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 2004 8–15 34.8% #109 1,669 0 10 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,659 0 10 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,732 0 11 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11