H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mark Woodforde vs Francisco Roig H2H: 1-1
Mark Woodforde and Francisco Roig are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1992 Charlotte fourth round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1992* | Charlotte | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Mark Woodforde | 6-4 7-5 | Francisco Roig | Match data |
| May 1, 1992* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Francisco Roig | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Francisco Roig | #889 | #60 | 579 | 1,715 | 64 | 96 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Woodforde | Francisco Roig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #122 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #129 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #172 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #156 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #153 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #333 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #798 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |