H2H data updated: 2026-10-22 00:00 UTC

Mark Woodforde vs Tim Wilkison H2H: 0-1

Tim Wilkison holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Wilkison leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Wilkison won the 1987 Toulouse round of 16 5-7 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 61 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tim Wilkison
USA Age 66 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Wilkison #61 5-7 6-4 7-6 Mark Woodforde #70 Match data Oct 16, 1987* R16 Toulouse ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,921 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Tim Wilkison #1,167 #23 269 1,896 294 298 49.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Woodforde Tim Wilkison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1977 21–27 43.8% #93 1,567 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1978 10–13 43.5% #54 1,659 0 1
19 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0 1979 26–26 50.0% #69 1,666 0 2
20 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,547 0 1 1980 24–25 49.0% #95 1,685 0 2
21 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1 1981 23–24 48.9% #71 1,756 0 3
22 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,802 0 2 1982 28–22 56.0% #61 1,715 0 4
23 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,714 0 3 1983 14–20 41.2% #88 1,683 0 4
24 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,718 0 3 1984 26–20 56.5% #39 1,767 0 5
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,632 0 3 1985 36–28 56.2% #44 1,807 0 6
26 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,812 0 3 1986 33–23 58.9% #29 1,772 0 6
27 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4 1987 23–20 53.5% #55 1,731 0 6
28 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4 1988 15–20 42.9% #121 1,673 0 6
29 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,761 0 4 1989 8–16 33.3% #124 1,601 0 6
30 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,803 0 4 1990 7–13 35.0% #210 1,542 0 6
31 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,735 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,609 0 4 1993 0–1 0.0% #1178 1,524 0 6
34 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,583 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Woodforde Tim Wilkison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 7 9 16 43.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1979 10 6 16 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 6 8 14 42.9%
20 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1980 15 10 25 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7%
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 8 13 21 38.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 5 7 12 41.7%
22 1988 23 10 33 69.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1982 14 4 18 77.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 8 13 38.5%
23 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 15 8 23 65.2% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1991 7 11 18 38.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1985 23 11 34 67.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 8 12 33.3%
26 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1986 14 11 25 56.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 1993 15 12 27 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1987 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1994 14 10 24 58.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1988 12 13 25 48.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
29 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1996 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1990 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 1997 13 14 27 48.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 179 153 332 53.9% 41 54 95 43.2% 48 43 91 52.7% 45 44 89 50.6% — 143 126 269 53.2% 34 39 73 46.6% 73 61 134 54.5% 44 72 116 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Woodforde Tim Wilkison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1567 122.4 — — — — -3 +28 -31 44.0% -0.32 6–6 (50%) 4–8 (33%) 100.0 +4.04
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1660 119.1 — — — — -158 — +58 42.4% -0.46 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) 101.8 +1.15
19 1985 1579 111.5 — — — — -12 — +27 58.6% +0.41 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.8 +1.07 1979 1666 141.3 — — — — +26 -130 +55 50.4% +0.12 5–5 (50%) 10–10 (50%) 101.0 -1.77
20 1986 1547 116.0 — — — — +33 -49 +94 41.7% -0.80 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 102.1 +1.28 1980 1685 133.1 — — — — +47 -139 -15 46.2% -0.09 8–4 (67%) 5–6 (45%) 104.1 +2.50
21 1987 1648 124.1 — — — — +11 -154 -35 49.3% +0.15 6–5 (55%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 +0.67 1981 1756 139.4 — — — — -103 — +46 50.4% -0.15 7–8 (47%) 9–5 (64%) 104.4 -1.41
22 1988 1802 150.3 — — — — +12 -238 -103 56.2% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 104.5 -2.00 1982 1716 131.5 — — — — +37 -178 +17 52.5% +0.20 12–3 (80%) 9–8 (53%) 107.9 +2.66
23 1989 1715 129.3 — — — — +66 -144 -42 53.1% +0.08 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) 99.1 +1.09 1983 1683 139.3 — — — — +39 — -5 42.2% -0.40 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) 100.3 -2.94
24 1990 1718 128.5 — — — — +12 — +3 50.0% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 97.3 -0.18 1984 1767 141.4 — — — — -9 -95 -134 54.5% +0.71 8–5 (62%) 5–11 (31%) 99.6 +1.11
25 1991 1633 130.1 -2.30 -0.49 0.885 47.4% +67 -69 — 36.9% -0.96 5–3 (63%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.27 1985 1807 144.0 — — — — -6 -169 -99 56.4% +0.46 9–13 (41%) 15–9 (63%) 99.0 -0.48
26 1992 1813 146.1 +1.29 +1.66 1.050 50.8% +8 -233 -144 53.6% +0.17 6–10 (38%) 14–9 (61%) 101.0 -3.48 1986 1773 145.5 — — — — +8 -113 -1 55.6% +0.64 10–5 (67%) 12–10 (55%) 105.6 -0.92
27 1993 1793 147.8 +1.20 +1.32 1.046 50.8% +19 -190 -121 56.7% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 100.4 -0.21 1987 1731 138.2 — — — — 0 — +53 50.9% +0.10 12–7 (63%) 9–8 (53%) 101.9 -0.49
28 1994 1793 144.0 +2.05 +1.57 1.087 51.3% +8 -106 -143 54.0% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -1.31 1988 1673 129.9 — — — — +18 — +13 44.2% -0.22 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 +0.05
29 1995 1761 143.4 +1.40 +2.84 1.115 51.5% -7 -71 -60 57.0% +0.31 6–9 (40%) 12–10 (55%) 96.4 -2.71 1989 1602 130.6 — — — — -14 +67 +72 33.9% -0.84 1–3 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.8 -1.68
30 1996 1803 152.4 +2.11 +1.19 1.039 51.0% +37 -161 -119 53.2% +0.43 11–9 (55%) 11–14 (44%) 99.0 -3.08 1990 1542 110.3 — — — — -17 +146 +113 34.0% -0.92 1–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.59
31 1997 1736 142.0 -0.58 +1.92 0.993 49.9% +5 -6 +26 51.5% +0.08 6–10 (38%) 11–9 (55%) 98.9 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1748 139.4 +0.21 -0.55 0.962 49.2% -9 -86 +48 52.0% +0.15 8–10 (44%) 7–10 (41%) 93.9 -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1610 125.8 -1.05 -0.14 0.914 48.2% +18 +2 +120 39.5% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–11 (27%) 93.5 -0.93 1993 1525 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.17
34 2000 1584 116.0 -0.30 +0.27 0.898 47.9% +5 — — 45.8% -0.29 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1921 146.3 +0.70 +1.19 1.018 50.2% +18 -118 -13 51.6% +0.11 93–99 (48%) 111–116 (49%) 97.4 -2.06 — 1897 141.4 — — — — -1 -64 +12 48.8% +0.03 94–75 (56%) 97–101 (49%) 104.5 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.