H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Markus Hipfl vs Adrian Voinea H2H: 1-1
Markus Hipfl and Adrian Voinea are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Markus Hipfl leads 1–0 on clay, while Adrian Voinea leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Markus Hipfl won the 2003 Amersfoort third round 2-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2003* | Amersfoort | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Markus Hipfl | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Adrian Voinea | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2000* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Adrian Voinea | 7-5 7-5 6-1 | Markus Hipfl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Markus Hipfl | #1,538 | #63 | 678 | 1,686 | 55 | 78 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Adrian Voinea | #1,046 | #36 | 957 | 1,756 | 126 | 168 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Markus Hipfl | Adrian Voinea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #768 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1275 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #451 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #56 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #45 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #76 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #71 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #125 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #110 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |