H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Marsel Ilhan vs Lukasz Kubot

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Marsel Ilhan vs Lukasz Kubot.

TUR Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 0
0 main draw meetings
POL Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marsel Ilhan #175 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) Lukasz Kubot #71 Match data Sep 30, 2013 Q1 Q China Open ATP 500 Hard
Marsel Ilhan #220 6-2 6-4 Lukasz Kubot #73 Match data Oct 1, 2012 Q1 Q China Open ATP 500 Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marsel Ilhan #1,764 #77 657 1,754 20 54 27.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lukasz Kubot #1,054 #41 977 1,870 82 120 40.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marsel Ilhan Lukasz Kubot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 2009 2–3 40.0% #155 1,591 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #219 1,514 0 0
23 2010 4–8 33.3% #90 1,655 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #142 1,484 0 0
24 2011 5–13 27.8% #111 1,683 0 0 2006 3–7 30.0% #125 1,552 0 0
25 2012 0–3 0.0% #215 1,571 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #222 1,485 0 0
27 2014 0–5 0.0% #104 1,635 0 0 2009 9–9 50.0% #101 1,730 0 0
28 2015 8–14 36.4% #114 1,703 0 0 2010 15–24 38.5% #70 1,653 0 0
29 2016 0–5 0.0% #246 1,570 0 0 2011 17–17 50.0% #57 1,818 0 0
30 2017 1–1 50.0% #324 1,576 0 0 2012 21–27 43.8% #74 1,716 0 0
31 2018 0–1 0.0% #543 1,559 0 0 2013 10–17 37.0% #72 1,667 0 0
32 2014 5–12 29.4% #170 1,670 0 0
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #471 1,698 0 0
34 2021 0–1 0.0% #755 1,541 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marsel Ilhan Lukasz Kubot
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 2009 2 3 5 40.0% 2004 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2010 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2011 2 10 12 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 7 4 11 63.6%
28 2015 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 5 9 14 35.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
30 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
31 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
33 2015 1 2 3 33.3%
34 2021 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 11 31 42 26.2% 5 16 21 23.8% 4 7 11 36.4% 33 62 95 34.7% 36 45 81 44.4% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 74/74 of Marsel Ilhan's and 199/202 of Lukasz Kubot's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marsel Ilhan Lukasz Kubot
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2009 5/5 5.6 1.4 68.6% 68.0% 49.3% 55.4% 36.1% 61.8% 29.9% 2004 2/2 1.5 3.0 62.7% 73.6% 41.1% 52.8% 16.7% 61.9% 40.0%
23 2010 12/12 7.4 1.8 62.9% 69.0% 53.0% 58.9% 43.1% 63.1% 36.7% 2005 1/1 0.0 1.0 83.0% 47.7% 55.6% 20.0% 0.0% 49.1% 27.5%
24 2011 18/18 7.3 2.6 61.2% 68.8% 47.4% 61.1% 46.7% 60.7% 33.1% 2006 10/10 3.3 4.3 61.6% 62.6% 44.2% 52.3% 33.1% 55.4% 33.8%
25 2012 3/3 3.0 1.3 67.6% 66.8% 54.6% 75.5% 19.4% 62.0% 32.7% 2007 3/3 2.7 2.0 60.8% 58.5% 40.6% 21.7% 46.8% 50.4% 41.3%
27 2014 5/5 5.2 1.0 60.6% 64.4% 58.4% 48.7% 17.9% 61.9% 26.7% 2009 18/18 4.2 3.0 62.5% 70.6% 49.6% 57.5% 37.8% 63.0% 36.1%
28 2015 22/22 6.1 2.1 60.5% 69.6% 47.3% 50.8% 27.2% 60.9% 31.8% 2010 38/39 4.6 4.7 62.5% 66.5% 45.5% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 37.0%
29 2016 5/5 2.6 2.4 55.5% 69.8% 37.4% 36.4% 31.1% 55.2% 30.3% 2011 34/34 5.1 5.8 61.4% 70.1% 46.4% 56.6% 52.7% 60.9% 37.0%
30 2017 2/2 8.5 2.5 46.5% 87.1% 52.2% 77.8% 33.3% 68.9% 38.0% 2012 47/48 4.3 4.3 61.4% 69.3% 48.3% 58.0% 39.7% 61.2% 37.0%
31 2018 1/1 2.0 0.0 71.8% 53.6% 36.4% 20.0% 0.0% 48.7% 23.4% 2013 26/27 6.5 4.5 62.6% 67.8% 45.0% 52.0% 41.4% 59.2% 37.1%
32 —/— 2014 17/17 7.6 5.7 59.9% 69.1% 48.8% 57.0% 33.4% 60.8% 32.4%
33 —/— 2015 3/3 8.0 4.3 65.8% 68.0% 54.5% 69.4% 14.3% 63.4% 31.7%
34 2021 1/1 1.0 1.0 80.0% 61.4% 27.3% 33.3% 50.0% 54.5% 32.7% —/—
Career 74/74 6.1 2.0 61.6% 68.9% 48.5% 54.9% 34.5% 60.9% 32.4% 199/202 5.0 4.6 61.9% 68.2% 46.9% 55.2% 41.9% 60.1% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marsel Ilhan Lukasz Kubot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 2008 1476 99.0
22 2009 1591 112.5 -2.06 -1.35 0.783 45.9% +40 33.3% -1.00 2–0 1–1 -0.13 2004 1514 104.6 +0.89 +0.01 1.051 50.3% 50.0% -0.25 -0.09
23 2010 1656 121.4 +0.27 -0.03 0.995 50.2% -21 42.9% -0.06 1–4 (20%) 0–2 -0.21 2005 1484 98.6 +2.62 -3.59 0.539 38.5% 0.0% -4.00 -0.11
24 2011 1683 128.4 -2.01 -2.77 0.841 47.4% -15 -10 31.1% -1.09 1–4 (20%) 3–5 (38%) -0.52 2006 1552 111.5 -2.84 -0.81 0.759 45.1% +43 36.7% -1.37 2–3 (40%) 1–1 +0.02
25 2012 1571 105.6 +0.17 -3.49 0.859 48.1% 14.3% -1.29 0–1 0–1 0.00 2007 1486 99.1 -3.22 -0.28 0.831 45.7% 14.3% -1.86 0–1 +0.02
26 2013 1533 104.0 2008 1507 103.0
27 2014 1635 114.5 -2.23 -3.69 0.701 45.2% 8.3% -2.08 0–1 +0.20 2009 1730 130.5 -0.39 +0.74 0.974 49.4% -21 -13 51.2% -0.07 2–5 (29%) 5–4 (56%) -0.34
28 2015 1704 133.7 -2.24 -2.38 0.812 46.6% -17 -22 -17 35.2% -1.09 2–2 (50%) 4–4 (50%) -1.17 2010 1653 134.9 -3.52 +0.17 0.895 48.1% +52 -19 -182 41.7% -0.46 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) +0.09
29 2016 1571 102.1 -2.34 -2.75 0.677 42.9% +12 8.3% -2.67 0–1 +0.09 2011 1819 141.7 -1.34 -0.12 0.947 49.2% -93 -18 -86 49.0% -0.07 10–7 (59%) 11–7 (61%) +0.47
30 2017 1577 99.5 -0.22 -1.20 1.221 52.6% 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 +0.26 2012 1716 137.7 -1.80 +0.15 0.952 49.5% -31 +48 -3 45.8% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 8–10 (44%) +0.63
31 2018 1560 93.5 -1.89 -4.09 0.456 34.9% 0.0% -4.50 -0.11 2013 1667 126.1 -3.42 -0.55 0.908 48.2% -63 +74 +118 41.1% -0.52 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) +1.16
32 2014 1670 124.3 -1.32 -2.59 0.827 47.1% -101 +15 +100 40.8% -0.73 1–6 (14%) 3–3 (50%) -0.27
33 2015 1698 119.7 -2.83 +2.52 0.866 48.0% -40 42.9% -0.72 0–1 2–1 (67%) -0.21
34 2021 1541 97.7 -0.78 -2.35 0.719 43.9% 0.0% -2.50 +0.30 2016 1654 102.7
Career 1754 121.8 -1.59 -2.17 0.830 47.0% -8 -18 -17 30.5% -1.10 6–13 (32%) 8–15 (35%) 92.4 -1.74 1871 133.5 -2.13 -0.20 0.909 48.4% -30 +7 +8 43.9% -0.40 26–45 (37%) 39–39 (50%) 98.9 +0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.