H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Martin Jaite vs Alberto Berasategui H2H: 2-0
Martin Jaite holds a 2–0 lead over Alberto Berasategui in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martin Jaite leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Jaite won the 1992 Sao Paulo fourth round 6-2 6-7(1) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 61
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1992* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Martin Jaite | 6-2 6-7(1) 6-3 | Alberto Berasategui | Match data |
| Apr 30, 1992* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Martin Jaite | 6-3 6-4 | Alberto Berasategui | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 272 | 157 | 63.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Alberto Berasategui | #1,019 | #7 | 2,532 | 1,982 | 276 | 195 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Alberto Berasategui | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1988 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #54 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,947 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 39–27 | 59.1% | #23 | 1,733 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,767 | 0 | 11 | 1998 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,649 | 0 | 14 |
| 26 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,739 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,678 | 0 | 12 | 2000 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #153 | 1,563 | 0 | 14 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,601 | 0 | 12 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #737 | 1,551 | 0 | 14 |