H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Martin Jaite vs Chris Lewis H2H: 1-0
Martin Jaite holds a 1–0 lead over Chris Lewis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Jaite leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martin Jaite won the 1984 Indianapolis third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 61
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 69
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 1984 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Martin Jaite | 6-2 6-4 | Chris Lewis | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 272 | 157 | 63.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Chris Lewis | #1,054 | #19 | 8 | 1,863 | 221 | 196 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Chris Lewis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #396 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #127 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #51 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #40 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #65 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #54 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,947 | 0 | 9 | 1981 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #31 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,767 | 0 | 11 | 1982 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 | 1983 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,678 | 0 | 12 | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #93 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,601 | 0 | 12 | 1985 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |