H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Martin Klizan vs Fabio Fognini H2H: 3-4

Fabio Fognini holds a 4–3 lead over Martin Klizan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Martin Klizan won the 2018 St. Petersburg fourth round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Klizan
Slovakia Age 37 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Fabio Fognini
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 21, 2018* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R16 Hard Martin Klizan #65 6-3 6-4 Fabio Fognini #13 Match data
Oct 8, 2015* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Fabio Fognini #28 6-2 6-1 Martin Klizan #42 Match data
May 4, 2014* Munich ATP 250 F Clay Martin Klizan #111 2-6 6-1 6-2 Fabio Fognini #15 Match data
Oct 24, 2013* Valencia ATP 250 R32 Hard Fabio Fognini #17 7-5 3-6 6-0 Martin Klizan #112 Match data
Jul 27, 2013* Umag ATP 250 QF Clay Fabio Fognini #19 6-4 6-2 Martin Klizan #37 Match data
Jun 20, 2013* Eastbourne ATP 250 R16 Grass Fabio Fognini #30 6-7(6) 6-2 6-2 Martin Klizan #35 Match data
Sep 23, 2012* St. Petersburg ATP 250 F Hard Martin Klizan #45 6-2 6-3 Fabio Fognini #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Martin Klizan #831 #24 1,445 1,979 128 146 46.7% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Fabio Fognini #188 #9 2,920 2,033 398 382 51.0% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Klizan Fabio Fognini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #395 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #305 1,482 0 0
19 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,542 0 0 2006 2–5 28.6% #247 1,476 0 0
20 2010 1–2 33.3% #155 1,607 0 0 2007 5–7 41.7% #95 1,600 0 0
21 2011 0–2 0.0% #117 1,600 0 0 2008 16–17 48.5% #88 1,612 0 0
22 2012 16–13 55.2% #30 1,795 0 1 2009 17–26 39.5% #54 1,716 0 0
23 2013 12–24 33.3% #108 1,690 0 1 2010 14–25 35.9% #55 1,702 0 0
24 2014 23–16 59.0% #34 1,899 0 2 2011 22–28 44.0% #48 1,725 0 0
25 2015 24–27 47.1% #43 1,794 0 3 2012 21–23 47.7% #45 1,763 0 0
26 2016 14–15 48.3% #35 1,750 0 5 2013 41–26 61.2% #16 1,932 0 2
27 2017 10–15 40.0% #141 1,755 0 5 2014 36–24 60.0% #20 1,823 0 3
28 2018 18–9 66.7% #41 1,917 0 6 2015 30–25 54.5% #21 1,908 0 3
29 2019 9–18 33.3% #141 1,703 0 6 2016 23–21 52.3% #49 1,864 0 4
30 2020 0–2 0.0% #151 1,649 0 6 2017 35–23 60.3% #27 1,945 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 2018 44–22 66.7% #13 1,949 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 2019 30–22 57.7% #12 1,911 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 2020 4–8 33.3% #17 1,800 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 2021 18–21 46.2% #37 1,766 0 9
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #835 1,556 0 6 2022 19–24 44.2% #55 1,700 0 9
36 — — — — — — — 2023 9–13 40.9% #107 1,690 0 9
37 — — — — — — — 2024 12–14 46.2% #91 1,675 0 9
38 — — — — — — — 2025 0–7 0.0% #188 1,577 0 9