H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Martin Verkerk vs Alex Corretja H2H: 0-1
Alex Corretja holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Verkerk in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alex Corretja leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 2004 Australian Open first round 6-4 1-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 47
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 6-4 1-6 6-3 6-4 | Martin Verkerk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Verkerk | #984 | #14 | 1,485 | 1,862 | 56 | 64 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Verkerk | Alex Corretja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #416 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #86 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2003 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #19 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #55 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #678 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 |