H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Martin Verkerk vs Florent Serra H2H: 1-0
Martin Verkerk holds a 1–0 lead over Florent Serra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Verkerk leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Verkerk won the 2003 Adelaide third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 47
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2003* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Martin Verkerk | 6-3 6-4 | Florent Serra | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Verkerk | #984 | #14 | 1,485 | 1,862 | 56 | 64 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Florent Serra | #942 | #36 | 1,371 | 1,816 | 123 | 170 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Verkerk | Florent Serra | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #416 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #86 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #213 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #19 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #55 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #60 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #678 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #65 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #69 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |