H2H data updated: 2026-07-21 13:16 UTC
Martin Verkerk vs Rik De Voest H2H: 0-1
Rik De Voest holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Verkerk in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rik De Voest leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rik De Voest won the 2007 Rotterdam third round 6-3 7-6(0).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 47
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 46
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2007* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Rik De Voest | 6-3 7-6(0) | Martin Verkerk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Verkerk | #984 | #14 | 1,485 | 1,862 | 56 | 64 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Rik De Voest | #1,088 | #110 | 538 | 1,693 | 19 | 38 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Verkerk | Rik De Voest | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #416 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2002 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #86 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #19 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #207 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #55 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #678 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #236 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #126 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |