H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Marton Fucsovics vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 0-1

Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Marton Fucsovics in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2015 Quito round of 32 3-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marton Fucsovics
Hungary Age 34 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #90 3-6 6-4 6-4 Marton Fucsovics #161 Match data Feb 5, 2015* R32 Quito ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marton Fucsovics #122 #31 1,659 2,002 166 179 48.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marton Fucsovics Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2012 0–1 0.0% #440 1,500 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2013 1–1 50.0% #181 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2015 0–2 0.0% #214 1,606 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2016 1–2 33.3% #158 1,616 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2017 5–8 38.5% #85 1,721 0 0 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2018 25–23 52.1% #36 1,818 0 1 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2019 22–25 46.8% #70 1,769 0 1 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2020 12–11 52.2% #55 1,881 0 1 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2021 26–24 52.0% #40 1,837 0 1 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2022 13–18 41.9% #87 1,704 0 1 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2023 22–20 52.4% #59 1,815 0 1 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2024 12–17 41.4% #104 1,779 0 2 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
33 2025 18–11 62.1% #55 1,838 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2026 9–16 36.0% #122 1,719 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marton Fucsovics Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2012 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
21 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2015 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2017 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2018 15 13 28 53.6% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2019 13 13 26 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2020 9 10 19 47.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2021 18 16 34 52.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2022 7 12 19 36.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 2023 13 12 25 52.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2024 5 11 16 31.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2025 8 5 13 61.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 6 10 16 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 99 108 207 47.8% 44 48 92 47.8% 23 23 46 50.0% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 339/345 of Marton Fucsovics's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marton Fucsovics Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2012 1/1 9.0 2.0 52.3% 75.4% 55.8% 83.3% 14.3% 66.1% 34.0% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2013 2/2 5.5 4.5 58.3% 68.7% 54.6% 55.6% 43.2% 62.1% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2015 2/2 2.0 3.5 59.0% 65.9% 45.4% 48.9% 47.2% 57.6% 33.4% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2016 3/3 2.3 4.0 52.8% 56.9% 52.6% 52.4% 42.9% 54.5% 44.2% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2017 13/13 5.3 3.8 54.5% 74.3% 51.7% 56.9% 41.4% 64.4% 41.8% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2018 47/48 4.3 3.4 55.3% 70.7% 52.5% 61.5% 43.2% 62.6% 40.0% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2019 46/47 4.1 3.7 58.0% 70.1% 49.7% 53.6% 41.0% 61.5% 38.6% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2020 23/23 4.1 2.8 58.6% 63.6% 48.3% 56.3% 44.9% 57.6% 39.7% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2021 49/50 4.3 3.9 59.6% 70.5% 51.7% 60.8% 44.2% 62.9% 38.7% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2022 31/31 4.4 3.9 61.4% 70.5% 51.1% 58.1% 36.3% 62.7% 35.6% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2023 41/42 4.3 3.7 59.1% 71.6% 52.0% 56.1% 43.4% 63.5% 37.8% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2024 28/29 5.1 2.1 63.4% 70.8% 52.7% 57.7% 42.1% 64.6% 37.6% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
33 2025 28/29 3.8 2.7 60.4% 73.1% 49.3% 53.1% 42.1% 63.5% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 25/25 4.2 4.2 61.0% 69.8% 48.8% 50.6% 31.6% 61.6% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 339/345 4.3 3.5 59.0% 70.3% 51.0% 56.9% 41.4% 62.4% 38.4% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marton Fucsovics Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2010 1462 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2011 1459 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2012 1501 102.7 -0.05 -2.56 1.001 50.2% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.13 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2013 1546 111.9 +0.02 -0.43 1.053 51.1% — — — 60.0% +0.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.01 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 1552 109.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.20
23 2015 1607 108.8 -1.06 -2.66 0.788 45.6% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 — — -0.01 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.24
24 2016 1617 113.1 -2.72 +1.91 0.971 49.1% — — — 33.3% -0.67 1–1 0–1 — -0.20 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.95
25 2017 1721 131.1 +0.48 +3.62 1.175 53.2% -16 -114 — 38.7% -0.10 1–3 (25%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.50 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.72
26 2018 1818 149.7 -0.86 +2.95 1.070 51.2% -9 -125 -201 55.1% +0.38 5–9 (36%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.31 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.11
27 2019 1770 155.0 -1.58 +2.30 1.001 49.9% +28 -49 -107 50.0% +0.03 7–12 (37%) 12–8 (60%) — -2.52 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.22
28 2020 1882 150.7 -2.60 +2.52 0.937 48.7% -27 -100 — 53.0% +0.03 3–1 (75%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.50 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.44
29 2021 1837 153.6 -0.03 +2.49 1.044 50.7% +8 -86 -41 50.0% +0.22 12–9 (57%) 13–17 (43%) — -3.08 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.04
30 2022 1705 136.5 -0.99 -0.31 0.956 49.2% -1 +44 +74 46.1% -0.25 5–7 (42%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.16 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.22
31 2023 1815 144.4 +0.37 +2.05 1.037 50.6% -54 -48 +71 51.7% +0.06 9–8 (53%) 8–9 (47%) — -1.86 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2024 1779 151.0 +0.56 +1.58 1.061 51.2% -23 +29 — 47.2% -0.01 3–8 (27%) 5–6 (45%) — -2.92 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2025 1838 135.6 -0.36 +3.24 1.107 51.5% -28 -72 +72 55.4% +0.39 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.71 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 1719 132.9 -1.70 -0.57 0.889 48.0% +3 -8 +139 39.0% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2002 147.6 -0.68 +1.96 1.021 50.3% -10 -54 +9 49.5% +0.04 53–66 (45%) 69–77 (47%) 95.7 -4.08 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.