H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marton Fucsovics vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 0-2
Dominic Thiem holds a 2–0 lead over Marton Fucsovics in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2021 Rome Masters third round 3-6 7-6(5) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Hungary
Age 34
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2021* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-0 | Marton Fucsovics | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2019* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 7-5 6-1 | Marton Fucsovics | Match data |
| Apr 21, 2014 | Barcelona | ATP 500 | Q2 | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 7-5 6-3 | Marton Fucsovics | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marton Fucsovics | #78 | #31 | 1,659 | 1,992 | 167 | 176 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marton Fucsovics | Dominic Thiem | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #158 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #85 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 2018 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #36 | 1,807 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 |
| 27 | 2019 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #70 | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2020 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #55 | 1,878 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 2021 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #40 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | 2022 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 2023 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #55 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #78 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |