H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Marton Fucsovics vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 0-2

Dominic Thiem holds a 2–0 lead over Marton Fucsovics in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2021 Italian Open second round 3-6 7-6(5) 6-0.

Hungary Age 34 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 2
2 main draw meetings
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominic Thiem #4 3-6 7-6(5) 6-0 Marton Fucsovics #44 Match data May 12, 2021* R32 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Dominic Thiem #4 7-5 6-1 Marton Fucsovics #50 Match data Jul 26, 2019* R16 Hamburg Open ATP 500 Clay
Dominic Thiem #80 7-5 6-3 Marton Fucsovics #182 Match data Apr 21, 2014 Q2 Q Barcelona Open ATP 500 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marton Fucsovics #122 #31 1,659 2,002 166 179 48.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marton Fucsovics Dominic Thiem
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0
18 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0
19 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0
20 2012 0–1 0.0% #440 1,500 0 0 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0
21 2013 1–1 50.0% #181 1,545 0 0 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3
22 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7
23 2015 0–2 0.0% #214 1,606 0 0 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8
24 2016 1–2 33.3% #158 1,616 0 0 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11
25 2017 5–8 38.5% #85 1,721 0 0 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16
26 2018 25–23 52.1% #36 1,818 0 1 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17
27 2019 22–25 46.8% #70 1,769 0 1 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17
28 2020 12–11 52.2% #55 1,881 0 1 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17
29 2021 26–24 52.0% #40 1,837 0 1 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17
30 2022 13–18 41.9% #87 1,704 0 1 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17
31 2023 22–20 52.4% #59 1,815 0 1
32 2024 12–17 41.4% #104 1,779 0 2
33 2025 18–11 62.1% #55 1,838 0 3
34 2026 9–16 36.0% #122 1,719 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marton Fucsovics Dominic Thiem
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2013 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2017 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2018 15 13 28 53.6% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0%
27 2019 13 13 26 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2020 9 10 19 47.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8%
29 2021 18 16 34 52.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2022 7 12 19 36.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2023 13 12 25 52.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
32 2024 5 11 16 31.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2025 8 5 13 61.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
34 2026 6 10 16 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
Career 99 108 207 47.8% 44 48 92 47.8% 23 23 46 50.0% 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 339/345 of Marton Fucsovics's and 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marton Fucsovics Dominic Thiem
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 —/— 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4%
18 —/— 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9%
19 —/— 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3%
20 2012 1/1 9.0 2.0 52.3% 75.4% 55.8% 83.3% 14.3% 66.1% 34.0% 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1%
21 2013 2/2 5.5 4.5 58.3% 68.7% 54.6% 55.6% 43.2% 62.1% 39.9% 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1%
22 —/— 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4%
23 2015 2/2 2.0 3.5 59.0% 65.9% 45.4% 48.9% 47.2% 57.6% 33.4% 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5%
24 2016 3/3 2.3 4.0 52.8% 56.9% 52.6% 52.4% 42.9% 54.5% 44.2% 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4%
25 2017 13/13 5.3 3.8 54.5% 74.3% 51.7% 56.9% 41.4% 64.4% 41.8% 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0%
26 2018 47/48 4.3 3.4 55.3% 70.7% 52.5% 61.5% 43.2% 62.6% 40.0% 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0%
27 2019 46/47 4.1 3.7 58.0% 70.1% 49.7% 53.6% 41.0% 61.5% 38.6% 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4%
28 2020 23/23 4.1 2.8 58.6% 63.6% 48.3% 56.3% 44.9% 57.6% 39.7% 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5%
29 2021 49/50 4.3 3.9 59.6% 70.5% 51.7% 60.8% 44.2% 62.9% 38.7% 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1%
30 2022 31/31 4.4 3.9 61.4% 70.5% 51.1% 58.1% 36.3% 62.7% 35.6% 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8%
31 2023 41/42 4.3 3.7 59.1% 71.6% 52.0% 56.1% 43.4% 63.5% 37.8% —/—
32 2024 28/29 5.1 2.1 63.4% 70.8% 52.7% 57.7% 42.1% 64.6% 37.6% —/—
33 2025 28/29 3.8 2.7 60.4% 73.1% 49.3% 53.1% 42.1% 63.5% 40.4% —/—
34 2026 25/25 4.2 4.2 61.0% 69.8% 48.8% 50.6% 31.6% 61.6% 34.1% —/—
Career 339/345 4.3 3.5 59.0% 70.3% 51.0% 56.9% 41.4% 62.4% 38.4% 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marton Fucsovics Dominic Thiem
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2010 1491 101.5
17 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.02
18 2010 1462 93.7 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 +0.16
19 2011 1459 99.3 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 +0.35
20 2012 1501 102.7 -0.05 -2.56 1.001 50.2% 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 +0.13 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 104.7 -1.38
21 2013 1546 111.9 +0.02 -0.43 1.053 51.1% 60.0% +0.40 0–1 1–0 -0.01 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) 97.2 +0.34
22 2014 1552 109.4 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) 118.6 -0.64
23 2015 1607 108.8 -1.06 -2.66 0.788 45.6% 20.0% -1.40 0–1 -0.01 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) 93.6 +0.76
24 2016 1617 113.1 -2.72 +1.91 0.971 49.1% 33.3% -0.67 1–1 0–1 -0.20 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) 103.1 +0.03
25 2017 1721 131.1 +0.48 +3.62 1.175 53.2% -16 -114 38.7% -0.10 1–3 (25%) 1–5 (17%) 97.3 -0.50 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) 111.2 -1.32
26 2018 1818 149.7 -0.86 +2.95 1.070 51.2% -9 -125 -201 55.1% +0.38 5–9 (36%) 10–8 (56%) 100.2 +0.31 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) 102.9 -2.09
27 2019 1770 155.0 -1.58 +2.30 1.001 49.9% +28 -49 -107 50.0% +0.03 7–12 (37%) 12–8 (60%) 99.1 -2.52 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 97.8 +0.26
28 2020 1882 150.7 -2.60 +2.52 0.937 48.7% -27 -100 53.0% +0.03 3–1 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 103.9 -0.50 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) 103.9 -2.20
29 2021 1837 153.6 -0.03 +2.49 1.044 50.7% +8 -86 -41 50.0% +0.22 12–9 (57%) 13–17 (43%) 96.8 -3.08 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) 96.8 -1.03
30 2022 1705 136.5 -0.99 -0.31 0.956 49.2% -1 +44 +74 46.1% -0.25 5–7 (42%) 5–9 (36%) 94.2 -1.16 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.8 -0.23
31 2023 1815 144.4 +0.37 +2.05 1.037 50.6% -54 -48 +71 51.7% +0.06 9–8 (53%) 8–9 (47%) 101.2 -1.86
32 2024 1779 151.0 +0.56 +1.58 1.061 51.2% -23 +29 47.2% -0.01 3–8 (27%) 5–6 (45%) 94.5 -2.92
33 2025 1838 135.6 -0.36 +3.24 1.107 51.5% -28 -72 +72 55.4% +0.39 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.7 -0.71
34 2026 1719 132.9 -1.69 -0.60 0.889 48.0% +4 -8 +140 39.0% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 6–6 (50%) 97.5 -0.83
Career 2002 147.6 -0.68 +1.96 1.021 50.3% -9 -54 +9 49.5% +0.04 53–66 (45%) 69–77 (47%) 95.7 -4.08 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.