H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Matteo Berrettini vs Adrian Mannarino H2H: 1-2
Adrian Mannarino holds a 2–1 lead over Matteo Berrettini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Adrian Mannarino leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Matteo Berrettini won the 2026 BNP Paribas Open first round 4-6 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 30
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
France
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2026 | BNP Paribas Open | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Matteo Berrettini | 4-6 7-5 7-5 | Adrian Mannarino | Match data |
| Oct 3, 2025* | Rolex Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Adrian Mannarino | 7-5 7-6 | Matteo Berrettini | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2018* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Adrian Mannarino | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Matteo Berrettini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matteo Berrettini | #43 | #6 | 5,533 | 2,144 | 202 | 120 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Adrian Mannarino | #49 | #17 | 1,975 | 1,966 | 317 | 370 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Matteo Berrettini | Adrian Mannarino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #134 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #87 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,941 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #192 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 38–12 | 76.0% | #7 | 2,083 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 27–10 | 73.0% | #16 | 2,026 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #92 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #47 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #34 | 1,916 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #60 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,867 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #28 | 1,945 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,862 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #43 | 1,841 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #35 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #22 | 1,907 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 14–28 | 33.3% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #69 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #49 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 |