H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Matteo Berrettini vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 2-0

Matteo Berrettini holds a 2–0 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Matteo Berrettini leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matteo Berrettini won the 2021 US Open first round 7-6(5) 7-6(7) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Matteo Berrettini
Italy Age 30 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Matteo Berrettini #8 7-6(5) 7-6(7) 6-3 Jeremy Chardy #70 Match data Sep 1, 2021* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Matteo Berrettini #48 7-6(12) 7-6(0) Jeremy Chardy #35 Match data Feb 21, 2019* R32 Marseille ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Matteo Berrettini #43 #6 5,533 2,130 206 124 62.4% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Matteo Berrettini Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2017 0–1 0.0% #135 1,485 0 0 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0
22 2018 19–19 50.0% #54 1,765 0 1 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1
23 2019 42–23 64.6% #8 2,043 0 3 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1
24 2020 9–6 60.0% #10 1,942 0 3 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1
25 2021 38–12 76.0% #7 2,072 0 5 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1
26 2022 27–10 73.0% #16 2,023 0 7 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2023 9–10 47.4% #92 1,939 0 7 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2024 27–12 69.2% #34 1,918 0 10 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1
29 2025 19–17 52.8% #56 1,867 0 10 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2026 16–14 53.3% #43 1,822 0 10 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Matteo Berrettini Jeremy Chardy
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2018 6 9 15 40.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2019 19 17 36 52.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2020 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2021 13 7 20 65.0% 14 4 18 77.8% 11 1 12 91.7% 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2022 14 8 22 63.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 0 9 100.0% 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2023 4 7 11 36.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2024 6 8 14 42.9% 15 1 16 93.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2025 15 13 28 53.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2026 5 5 10 50.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 87 78 165 52.7% 76 33 109 69.7% 43 13 56 76.8% — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 324/331 of Matteo Berrettini's and 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Matteo Berrettini Jeremy Chardy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3%
21 2017 1/1 1.0 3.0 50.8% 61.3% 36.7% 60.0% — 49.2% 17.9% 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6%
22 2018 38/38 7.7 2.1 62.1% 75.3% 52.6% 60.9% 38.6% 66.6% 33.9% 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5%
23 2019 65/65 8.9 2.2 61.8% 78.7% 54.4% 65.2% 40.3% 69.3% 34.6% 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9%
24 2020 15/15 10.1 2.3 61.9% 81.1% 58.3% 64.8% 32.4% 72.3% 35.8% 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1%
25 2021 48/50 12.1 1.8 64.5% 80.2% 54.1% 69.7% 41.6% 71.0% 36.3% 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0%
26 2022 37/37 12.7 2.2 63.8% 78.8% 51.5% 67.8% 37.6% 69.1% 35.5% 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8%
27 2023 18/19 9.3 1.7 65.3% 76.8% 50.1% 70.6% 28.2% 67.4% 34.5% 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5%
28 2024 39/39 9.4 1.5 68.5% 78.1% 53.8% 68.1% 39.7% 70.3% 35.0% 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6%
29 2025 33/36 10.3 1.6 67.7% 75.9% 52.7% 55.6% 32.6% 68.2% 33.0% 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8%
30 2026 30/31 8.7 2.2 67.1% 75.4% 53.4% 62.6% 37.4% 68.1% 35.3% 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9%
Career — 324/331 9.9 1.9 64.5% 77.8% 53.4% 65.1% 37.7% 69.1% 34.8% — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Matteo Berrettini Jeremy Chardy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03
21 2017 1485 102.8 +0.92 -3.86 0.353 37.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.02 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) — -0.36
22 2018 1765 138.1 +2.33 -2.13 1.016 49.9% -131 +18 -92 48.5% -0.15 7–7 (50%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.51 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) — -2.59
23 2019 2044 163.1 +5.27 -0.41 1.128 51.5% -126 -122 -132 60.2% +0.54 9–6 (60%) 22–17 (56%) — -2.94 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.43
24 2020 1942 131.3 +4.75 +0.38 1.294 53.0% -70 -60 — 63.0% +0.89 1–3 (25%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.51 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.53
25 2021 2073 157.5 +7.22 +0.36 1.249 53.2% -113 -38 +52 70.9% +1.15 8–2 (80%) 19–9 (68%) — -0.22 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) — +1.81
26 2022 2024 151.0 +4.84 -0.22 1.147 52.0% -70 +21 +210 64.5% +0.73 11–5 (69%) 13–8 (62%) — +0.83 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) — +2.11
27 2023 1939 138.4 +2.92 -0.29 1.060 50.2% -88 — +269 58.1% +0.39 1–3 (25%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.71 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) — +0.64
28 2024 1918 147.1 +4.95 -0.52 1.180 52.3% -112 +237 +231 68.1% +0.93 4–5 (44%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.43 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) — -0.92
29 2025 1868 158.3 +3.59 -1.58 1.038 50.7% -13 +225 — 54.5% +0.26 5–7 (42%) 12–13 (48%) — -2.31 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) — +2.28
30 2026 1823 136.1 +2.61 -0.82 1.105 51.3% -11 +130 +207 53.7% +0.16 4–5 (44%) 13–6 (68%) — +0.24 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -1.26
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.20
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) — -2.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) — -2.92
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32
Career — 2131 156.9 +4.54 -0.61 1.126 51.6% -84 +48 +81 60.6% +0.55 50–43 (54%) 114–81 (58%) 106.2 -1.39 — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.