H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Matteo Berrettini vs Tennys Sandgren H2H: 0-1
Tennys Sandgren holds a 1–0 lead over Matteo Berrettini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tennys Sandgren leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tennys Sandgren won the 2020 Australian Open second round 7-6(7) 6-4 4-6 2-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 30
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2020* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Tennys Sandgren | 7-6(7) 6-4 4-6 2-6 7-5 | Matteo Berrettini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matteo Berrettini | #43 | #6 | 5,533 | 2,144 | 202 | 120 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Tennys Sandgren | #1,243 | #41 | 1,091 | 1,870 | 47 | 75 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Matteo Berrettini | Tennys Sandgren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,941 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 38–12 | 76.0% | #7 | 2,083 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #96 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 27–10 | 73.0% | #16 | 2,026 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #92 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #68 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #34 | 1,916 | 0 | 10 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,867 | 0 | 10 | 2021 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #96 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #43 | 1,862 | 0 | 10 | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #506 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |