H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Matthew Ebden vs Somdev Devvarman H2H: 1-1
Matthew Ebden and Somdev Devvarman are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Somdev Devvarman leads 1–0 on clay, while Matthew Ebden leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Somdev Devvarman won the 2014 Estoril third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
IND
Age 41
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2014 | Beijing | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Somdev Devvarman | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-2 | Matthew Ebden | Match data |
| May 1, 2014* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Somdev Devvarman | 6-2 6-3 | Matthew Ebden | Match data |
| Jun 8, 2011* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R64 | Grass | Matthew Ebden | 7-5 6-3 | Somdev Devvarman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Ebden | #970 | #39 | 1,134 | 1,849 | 75 | 129 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Somdev Devvarman | #1,347 | #62 | 771 | 1,799 | 49 | 70 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Matthew Ebden | Somdev Devvarman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1116 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1033 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #105 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #126 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #68 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #108 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #231 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #84 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #105 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #664 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #698 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #90 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #76 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #138 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #46 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #244 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #909 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #237 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #740 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |