H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Matthew Ebden vs Stephane Robert H2H: 1-0
Matthew Ebden holds a 1–0 lead over Stephane Robert in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Matthew Ebden leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Matthew Ebden won the 2018 Wimbledon second round 6-3 7-6(5) 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 46
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2018* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Matthew Ebden | 6-3 7-6(5) 4-6 6-1 | Stephane Robert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Ebden | #970 | #39 | 1,134 | 1,849 | 75 | 129 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stephane Robert | #1,486 | #50 | 926 | 1,839 | 38 | 75 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Matthew Ebden | Stephane Robert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #105 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #68 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #231 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #105 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #698 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #76 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #46 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #122 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #244 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #105 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #237 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #740 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #134 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #208 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #218 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #898 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |