H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Matthew Ebden vs Steve Darcis H2H: 0-1

Steve Darcis holds a 1–0 lead over Matthew Ebden in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Steve Darcis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Steve Darcis won the 2012 Eastbourne Open first round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Matthew Ebden
AUS Age 38 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Steve Darcis
BEL Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Steve Darcis #72 6-2 6-4 Matthew Ebden #75 Match data Jun 20, 2012* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Matthew Ebden #970 #39 1,134 1,849 75 129 36.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Steve Darcis #756 #38 1,362 1,852 94 124 43.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Matthew Ebden Steve Darcis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 2010 1–2 33.3% #196 1,526 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #483 1,472 0 0
23 2011 10–10 50.0% #86 1,762 0 0 2007 6–2 75.0% #86 1,667 0 1
24 2012 15–23 39.5% #105 1,644 0 0 2008 20–20 50.0% #61 1,761 0 2
25 2013 4–11 26.7% #68 1,634 0 0 2009 5–18 21.7% #122 1,544 0 2
26 2014 5–21 19.2% #231 1,539 0 0 2010 4–6 40.0% #109 1,678 0 2
27 2015 1–6 14.3% #105 1,631 0 0 2011 7–6 53.8% #88 1,794 0 2
28 2016 0–4 0.0% #698 1,573 0 0 2012 19–18 51.4% #93 1,785 0 2
29 2017 9–7 56.2% #76 1,739 0 0 2013 2–7 22.2% #164 1,717 0 2
30 2018 19–22 46.3% #46 1,790 0 0 2014 0–1 0.0% #160 1,706 0 2
31 2019 5–16 23.8% #244 1,654 0 0 2015 8–11 42.1% #86 1,738 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2016 3–5 37.5% #86 1,773 0 2
33 2021 6–5 54.5% #237 1,591 0 0 2017 16–18 47.1% #77 1,807 0 2
34 2022 0–1 0.0% #740 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2019 4–11 26.7% #157 1,668 0 2
36 2024 0–1 0.0% — 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Matthew Ebden Steve Darcis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2011 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — —
24 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2008 10 9 19 52.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2013 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 1 10 11 9.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 2014 4 12 16 25.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2010 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2015 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2016 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 9 9 18 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
29 2017 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2018 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2015 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2021 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 12 10 22 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
34 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 55 89 144 38.2% 1 14 15 6.7% 19 26 45 42.2% — — — — — 52 66 118 44.1% 24 38 62 38.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 2 1 3 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 203/203 of Matthew Ebden's and 209/218 of Steve Darcis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Matthew Ebden Steve Darcis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2010 3/3 6.3 1.0 66.7% 72.6% 58.1% 64.3% 61.7% 67.6% 31.2% 2006 1/1 2.0 3.0 53.8% 60.5% 59.5% 75.0% — 60.0% 24.5%
23 2011 20/20 5.8 2.7 61.6% 72.0% 47.9% 47.2% 36.9% 63.0% 35.9% 2007 8/8 4.4 1.9 56.6% 74.9% 49.9% 48.9% 42.3% 64.3% 41.9%
24 2012 38/38 5.4 4.1 62.3% 68.9% 44.8% 52.5% 33.0% 59.8% 34.5% 2008 39/40 4.9 1.9 60.0% 69.3% 51.1% 57.2% 42.3% 61.6% 36.0%
25 2013 15/15 5.6 5.7 56.5% 73.1% 45.0% 50.4% 30.9% 61.0% 34.2% 2009 22/23 4.5 2.3 57.6% 71.8% 50.5% 57.3% 37.5% 62.8% 34.1%
26 2014 26/26 4.4 6.2 57.7% 68.5% 39.2% 44.0% 37.7% 55.6% 32.2% 2010 10/10 3.2 1.9 60.1% 66.2% 50.4% 55.2% 46.3% 59.9% 35.6%
27 2015 7/7 7.1 5.0 58.8% 71.7% 51.1% 63.2% 44.0% 62.9% 32.2% 2011 13/13 5.2 3.8 58.6% 68.5% 48.8% 53.9% 44.7% 60.0% 37.3%
28 2016 4/4 2.8 3.8 53.6% 51.5% 39.7% 44.0% 45.5% 46.2% 25.6% 2012 33/37 4.1 1.3 63.4% 69.0% 51.7% 56.0% 41.1% 62.7% 37.1%
29 2017 16/16 4.7 4.4 64.7% 71.6% 47.8% 54.0% 39.3% 63.1% 38.2% 2013 8/9 4.0 2.6 62.5% 69.4% 52.7% 51.2% 30.6% 62.7% 33.5%
30 2018 41/41 7.5 5.3 59.7% 72.5% 50.1% 59.9% 42.6% 63.3% 35.2% 2014 1/1 9.0 6.0 61.3% 67.0% 58.5% 68.8% 46.2% 63.7% 37.9%
31 2019 21/21 7.0 6.0 59.8% 71.7% 42.0% 54.0% 46.1% 59.9% 35.6% 2015 18/19 2.6 2.3 62.3% 64.5% 50.0% 64.6% 38.6% 59.5% 35.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 8/8 4.5 4.3 54.5% 71.3% 52.0% 52.8% 38.9% 62.4% 36.9%
33 2021 11/11 4.3 3.3 62.6% 71.7% 48.9% 64.3% 49.0% 62.5% 34.1% 2017 33/34 3.3 1.5 61.7% 67.8% 46.8% 54.4% 44.9% 58.8% 36.9%
34 2022 1/1 5.0 3.0 69.2% 83.3% 54.2% 0.0% 50.0% 74.4% 27.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 15/15 3.6 1.9 62.3% 66.1% 47.3% 62.1% 36.9% 58.5% 31.7%
Career — 203/204 5.8 4.7 60.4% 70.7% 46.0% 53.2% 39.6% 60.8% 34.5% — 209/218 4.1 2.1 60.6% 68.7% 50.0% 56.7% 40.9% 61.1% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Matthew Ebden Steve Darcis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1500 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1486 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1490 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1487 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1526 117.9 +1.93 +0.66 0.965 49.8% +20 — — 28.6% -0.57 — — — -0.49 2006 1472 94.9 -4.72 -4.47 0.613 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.17
23 2011 1762 127.8 +1.26 -1.35 0.971 49.6% -32 — -47 44.4% -0.42 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.59 2007 1667 133.9 +1.36 +2.37 1.174 53.0% — +39 — 66.7% +1.00 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.67
24 2012 1645 128.5 -2.57 -1.66 0.858 47.3% +15 -179 +28 39.8% -0.69 9–5 (64%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.07 2008 1761 135.5 -1.36 -0.31 0.939 49.3% -35 -44 -175 50.0% -0.07 6–4 (60%) 12–5 (71%) — -0.16
25 2013 1635 122.7 -1.51 -1.64 0.876 47.9% +18 — — 31.6% -1.24 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.71 2009 1545 116.6 -1.07 -1.53 0.918 48.7% +10 +55 +98 24.1% -1.26 1–4 (20%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.42
26 2014 1540 122.0 -6.43 -2.74 0.726 44.3% +30 -112 +36 26.2% -1.63 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.48 2010 1678 128.9 -1.59 -0.51 0.889 48.2% +4 -43 — 52.6% +0.26 0–1 — — -0.11
27 2015 1631 122.0 -2.35 -0.31 0.869 48.1% -24 — +48 30.0% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 0–6 (0%) — +0.22 2011 1795 125.8 -2.07 -0.57 0.934 48.6% -43 -55 — 47.4% -0.03 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.14
28 2016 1573 113.0 -4.76 -3.67 0.476 37.3% -25 — — 12.5% -3.13 — — — +0.28 2012 1786 143.8 -0.59 +0.30 0.994 50.0% -43 -40 -50 54.4% -0.01 7–8 (47%) 16–3 (84%) — -2.70
29 2017 1739 127.4 -1.27 +2.03 1.034 50.6% -69 — +46 50.0% +0.21 5–1 (83%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.33 2013 1717 114.5 -0.61 -0.45 0.898 48.1% -62 — +57 33.3% -1.05 0–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.52
30 2018 1791 148.3 -0.68 +0.04 0.958 49.3% -42 — +64 47.1% -0.21 6–6 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.04 2014 1706 110.7 +1.34 +0.22 1.043 51.1% — — — 40.0% +0.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.14
31 2019 1654 126.9 -3.44 +0.06 0.888 47.9% +33 — +98 33.3% -0.87 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.35 2015 1739 139.6 -2.44 0.00 0.871 47.8% +50 -47 — 43.2% -0.60 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -1.13
32 2020 1631 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1773 129.3 -0.69 +1.36 0.982 49.4% -2 — — 40.7% -0.33 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.32
33 2021 1592 115.4 +0.31 -1.06 0.910 49.0% +57 — — 61.9% +0.67 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.15 2017 1807 136.2 -3.10 +0.27 0.897 47.9% +17 -72 -137 48.1% -0.27 4–3 (57%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.06
34 2022 1527 96.8 -2.43 +2.78 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1669 114.6 -4.04 -3.13 0.764 45.3% +41 — +47 32.4% -1.27 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.76
36 2024 1527 107.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.17 2020 1648 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1849 131.9 -2.03 -0.86 0.881 47.9% -1 -137 +45 39.0% -0.67 33–31 (52%) 29–43 (40%) 97.8 +0.25 — 1852 137.3 -1.67 -0.31 0.923 48.7% -5 -28 -35 45.2% -0.33 29–29 (50%) 46–35 (57%) 105.6 -2.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.