H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Matthias Bachinger vs Daniel Brands H2H: 1-0

Matthias Bachinger holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Brands in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Matthias Bachinger leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Matthias Bachinger won the 2012 Tiriac Open quarterfinal 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Matthias Bachinger
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Brands
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Matthias Bachinger #325 6-3 6-4 Daniel Brands #135 Match data Apr 25, 2016 Q1 Q Munich Open ATP 250 Clay
Daniel Brands #111 7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 Matthias Bachinger #119 Match data Oct 16, 2012* Q3 Q Vienna Open ATP 250 Hard
Matthias Bachinger #120 6-4 6-1 Daniel Brands #119 Match data Apr 28, 2012* QF Tiriac Open ATP 250 Clay

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Matthias Bachinger #1,763 #85 625 1,770 31 55 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Brands #1,055 #51 896 1,886 58 93 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Matthias Bachinger Daniel Brands
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #220 1,491 0 0
20 2007 1–1 50.0% #173 1,490 0 0 2008 1–4 20.0% #150 1,539 0 0
21 2008 0–4 0.0% #225 1,509 0 0 2009 7–5 58.3% #92 1,645 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2010 9–19 32.1% #104 1,670 0 0
23 2010 1–2 33.3% #187 1,602 0 0 2011 4–11 26.7% #110 1,690 0 0
24 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,566 0 0 2012 5–8 38.5% #153 1,688 0 0
25 2012 9–16 36.0% #123 1,626 0 0 2013 23–23 50.0% #54 1,809 0 0
26 2013 2–6 25.0% #159 1,610 0 0 2014 2–11 15.4% #329 1,713 0 0
27 2014 4–2 66.7% #141 1,705 0 0 2015 2–1 66.7% #159 1,729 0 0
28 2015 2–4 33.3% #222 1,676 0 0 2016 2–4 33.3% #168 1,660 0 0
29 2016 0–1 0.0% #493 1,639 0 0 2017 1–4 20.0% #320 1,664 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #182 1,616 0 0
31 2018 5–4 55.6% #130 1,683 0 0 2019 1–1 50.0% #465 1,605 0 0
32 2019 3–4 42.9% #223 1,649 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2021 0–1 0.0% #234 1,572 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Matthias Bachinger Daniel Brands
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
21 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2011 4 5 9 44.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
25 2012 2 9 11 18.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2013 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2014 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2014 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2015 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2018 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2019 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 18 29 47 38.3% 11 19 30 36.7% 2 7 9 22.2% — 30 49 79 38.0% 21 34 55 38.2% 7 10 17 41.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Matthias Bachinger Daniel Brands
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 7.5 2.0 64.3% 87.8% 59.9% 100.0% 16.7% 77.8% 23.5%
20 2007 2/2 10.0 2.5 55.4% 67.3% 53.5% 53.6% 47.3% 61.5% 34.2% 2008 5/5 8.0 4.4 61.7% 75.9% 40.5% 48.6% 34.2% 63.2% 30.6%
21 2008 4/4 5.8 4.0 53.1% 75.3% 41.0% 52.7% 24.0% 59.1% 35.0% 2009 12/12 8.3 3.3 67.9% 76.6% 51.4% 69.8% 37.8% 68.6% 34.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 28/28 9.3 3.0 64.5% 69.9% 53.9% 57.0% 31.5% 63.9% 29.5%
23 2010 3/3 6.7 2.7 66.9% 74.0% 51.7% 53.9% 17.7% 66.4% 36.8% 2011 15/15 7.0 3.0 68.7% 68.6% 47.4% 57.3% 31.0% 61.7% 28.0%
24 2011 14/14 7.4 3.2 60.1% 72.2% 48.2% 56.5% 41.3% 62.9% 34.4% 2012 13/13 11.1 3.8 63.0% 76.4% 48.5% 49.4% 35.6% 66.2% 31.8%
25 2012 25/25 6.5 2.6 56.3% 74.2% 47.1% 58.0% 35.2% 62.1% 34.9% 2013 46/46 8.5 2.2 66.8% 72.9% 53.0% 57.6% 35.3% 66.2% 33.4%
26 2013 8/8 6.0 3.6 57.2% 68.1% 46.1% 64.1% 48.5% 58.4% 32.2% 2014 13/13 9.2 1.8 69.7% 68.9% 50.3% 62.1% 22.8% 62.9% 29.5%
27 2014 6/6 9.0 2.0 65.3% 76.6% 53.5% 52.6% 34.7% 68.2% 34.0% 2015 3/3 7.3 3.3 54.4% 75.4% 62.8% 43.8% 27.8% 71.2% 37.0%
28 2015 6/6 6.8 4.2 61.3% 70.3% 54.4% 72.6% 23.9% 64.3% 35.5% 2016 6/6 12.3 5.0 64.1% 72.7% 51.2% 59.5% 53.3% 64.7% 32.0%
29 2016 1/1 3.0 1.0 67.6% 60.9% 27.3% 61.5% 42.9% 50.0% 36.4% 2017 5/5 7.0 5.2 64.9% 70.4% 41.0% 62.4% 23.2% 59.4% 29.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 13.0 4.0 71.7% 70.4% 64.3% 66.7% 0.0% 68.7% 28.6%
31 2018 9/9 6.4 1.2 63.7% 69.3% 43.0% 62.9% 37.5% 59.7% 35.8% 2019 2/2 8.0 3.0 66.9% 67.0% 55.3% 66.7% 43.8% 63.0% 35.5%
32 2019 7/7 7.6 3.3 61.6% 69.9% 45.2% 65.5% 43.5% 60.3% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1/1 7.0 3.0 59.5% 66.0% 47.1% 78.6% 50.0% 58.3% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 86/86 6.9 2.8 59.6% 72.0% 47.4% 59.9% 36.9% 61.9% 34.7% — 151/151 8.8 3.0 66.0% 72.3% 51.4% 58.5% 33.1% 65.1% 31.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Matthias Bachinger Daniel Brands
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1492 106.0 -2.82 -3.49 1.057 51.7% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
20 2007 1491 101.0 +0.72 +0.18 0.889 48.6% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 1–1 — +0.02 2008 1540 111.5 -1.86 -1.37 0.830 46.7% — +37 — 25.0% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 2008 1510 107.3 -1.67 -2.28 0.857 46.4% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–2 0–2 — +0.27 2009 1645 119.5 +2.51 -1.77 1.108 51.4% — +44 — 53.3% +0.30 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.22
22 2009 1521 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1671 129.6 +0.41 -4.53 0.817 46.9% -109 -45 +44 34.3% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.34
23 2010 1603 118.6 +1.21 -2.06 1.094 50.3% +49 — — 37.5% -0.13 1–1 0–1 — +0.10 2011 1691 120.3 -1.58 -5.51 0.732 45.6% -31 -86 — 27.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.41
24 2011 1566 125.3 -0.11 -2.05 0.927 48.5% +32 -123 -7 34.3% -0.54 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.19 2012 1689 117.4 +1.52 -2.94 0.940 48.7% +10 -50 — 45.5% -0.36 1–3 (25%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.51
25 2012 1626 128.2 -0.70 -2.40 0.919 48.7% -8 -10 — 37.5% -0.59 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.90 2013 1809 149.3 +2.79 -2.73 0.988 49.7% -11 +4 -192 47.8% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.24
26 2013 1610 124.0 -1.35 -2.83 0.776 46.3% +18 +44 — 35.0% -1.20 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.13 2014 1713 128.9 -0.97 -3.58 0.796 46.4% +3 — — 33.3% -1.28 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.62
27 2014 1706 123.7 +3.27 +0.19 1.069 51.2% +72 — — 52.9% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.19 2015 1729 122.1 +0.44 +1.03 1.284 52.5% +26 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 1–0 — -0.11
28 2015 1676 119.3 +0.21 -1.46 0.994 49.5% +73 — — 33.3% -0.33 — 1–4 (20%) — +0.04 2016 1661 117.0 +0.34 -3.35 0.907 48.9% +50 — — 42.1% -0.32 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.06
29 2016 1640 112.2 -2.73 -0.24 0.727 43.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.15 2017 1665 110.8 -1.31 -3.25 0.724 45.2% — — — 16.7% -1.42 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.08
30 2017 1618 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1616 97.9 +1.38 +0.15 0.912 48.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
31 2018 1684 123.9 -0.20 -1.18 0.887 47.8% +35 — — 47.8% -0.57 3–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.06 2019 1605 109.1 +0.20 -3.04 0.961 49.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.28
32 2019 1649 122.9 -2.25 -1.27 0.879 48.3% +62 -60 — 41.2% -0.59 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1605 105.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1573 103.0 -1.45 -2.97 0.762 46.9% — — — — — — — — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1539 95.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1771 124.6 -0.38 -1.82 0.909 48.4% +33 -22 -7 38.2% -0.57 17–16 (52%) 17–26 (40%) 101.7 +0.85 — 1886 131.0 +0.91 -3.27 0.900 48.3% -25 -9 -63 40.4% -0.64 18–26 (41%) 43–43 (50%) 98.0 -2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.