H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Matthias Bachinger vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 1-0

Matthias Bachinger holds a 1–0 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Matthias Bachinger leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matthias Bachinger won the 2010 Stockholm Open first round 6-4 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Matthias Bachinger
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lukasz Kubot
POL Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Matthias Bachinger #104 6-1 6-1 Lukasz Kubot #92 Match data Apr 14, 2013 Q1 Q Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Lukasz Kubot #67 6-3 6-7(7) 7-6(2) Matthias Bachinger #121 Match data Oct 22, 2012 Q1 Q Swiss Indoors ATP 500 Hard
Lukasz Kubot #64 6-4 2-6 6-2 Matthias Bachinger #90 Match data Oct 31, 2011 Q1 Q Swiss Indoors ATP 500 Hard
Matthias Bachinger #275 6-4 4-6 6-3 Lukasz Kubot #64 Match data Oct 21, 2010* R32 Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard

3 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Matthias Bachinger #1,763 #85 625 1,770 31 55 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lukasz Kubot #1,054 #41 977 1,870 82 120 40.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Matthias Bachinger Lukasz Kubot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2007 1–1 50.0% #173 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2008 0–4 0.0% #225 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — 2004 1–1 50.0% #219 1,514 0 0
23 2010 1–2 33.3% #187 1,602 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #142 1,484 0 0
24 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,566 0 0 2006 3–7 30.0% #125 1,552 0 0
25 2012 9–16 36.0% #123 1,626 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #222 1,485 0 0
26 2013 2–6 25.0% #159 1,610 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2014 4–2 66.7% #141 1,705 0 0 2009 9–9 50.0% #101 1,730 0 0
28 2015 2–4 33.3% #222 1,676 0 0 2010 15–24 38.5% #70 1,653 0 0
29 2016 0–1 0.0% #493 1,639 0 0 2011 17–17 50.0% #57 1,818 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2012 21–27 43.8% #74 1,716 0 0
31 2018 5–4 55.6% #130 1,683 0 0 2013 10–17 37.0% #72 1,667 0 0
32 2019 3–4 42.9% #223 1,649 0 0 2014 5–12 29.4% #170 1,670 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2015 1–2 33.3% #471 1,698 0 0
34 2021 0–1 0.0% #234 1,572 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Matthias Bachinger Lukasz Kubot
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2006 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2012 2 9 11 18.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2013 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — —
28 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 5 9 14 35.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
31 2018 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 2019 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 18 29 47 38.3% 11 19 30 36.7% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — 33 62 95 34.7% 36 45 81 44.4% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 86/86 of Matthias Bachinger's and 199/202 of Lukasz Kubot's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Matthias Bachinger Lukasz Kubot
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2007 2/2 10.0 2.5 55.4% 67.3% 53.5% 53.6% 47.3% 61.5% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 4/4 5.8 4.0 53.1% 75.3% 41.0% 52.7% 24.0% 59.1% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 1.5 3.0 62.7% 73.6% 41.1% 52.8% 16.7% 61.9% 40.0%
23 2010 3/3 6.7 2.7 66.9% 74.0% 51.7% 53.9% 17.7% 66.4% 36.8% 2005 1/1 0.0 1.0 83.0% 47.7% 55.6% 20.0% 0.0% 49.1% 27.5%
24 2011 14/14 7.4 3.2 60.1% 72.2% 48.2% 56.5% 41.3% 62.9% 34.4% 2006 10/10 3.3 4.3 61.6% 62.6% 44.2% 52.3% 33.1% 55.4% 33.8%
25 2012 25/25 6.5 2.6 56.3% 74.2% 47.1% 58.0% 35.2% 62.1% 34.9% 2007 3/3 2.7 2.0 60.8% 58.5% 40.6% 21.7% 46.8% 50.4% 41.3%
26 2013 8/8 6.0 3.6 57.2% 68.1% 46.1% 64.1% 48.5% 58.4% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 6/6 9.0 2.0 65.3% 76.6% 53.5% 52.6% 34.7% 68.2% 34.0% 2009 18/18 4.2 3.0 62.5% 70.6% 49.6% 57.5% 37.8% 63.0% 36.1%
28 2015 6/6 6.8 4.2 61.3% 70.3% 54.4% 72.6% 23.9% 64.3% 35.5% 2010 38/39 4.6 4.7 62.5% 66.5% 45.5% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 37.0%
29 2016 1/1 3.0 1.0 67.6% 60.9% 27.3% 61.5% 42.9% 50.0% 36.4% 2011 34/34 5.1 5.8 61.4% 70.1% 46.4% 56.6% 52.7% 60.9% 37.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 47/48 4.3 4.3 61.4% 69.3% 48.3% 58.0% 39.7% 61.2% 37.0%
31 2018 9/9 6.4 1.2 63.7% 69.3% 43.0% 62.9% 37.5% 59.7% 35.8% 2013 26/27 6.5 4.5 62.6% 67.8% 45.0% 52.0% 41.4% 59.2% 37.1%
32 2019 7/7 7.6 3.3 61.6% 69.9% 45.2% 65.5% 43.5% 60.3% 34.9% 2014 17/17 7.6 5.7 59.9% 69.1% 48.8% 57.0% 33.4% 60.8% 32.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 3/3 8.0 4.3 65.8% 68.0% 54.5% 69.4% 14.3% 63.4% 31.7%
34 2021 1/1 7.0 3.0 59.5% 66.0% 47.1% 78.6% 50.0% 58.3% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 86/86 6.9 2.8 59.6% 72.0% 47.4% 59.9% 36.9% 61.9% 34.7% — 199/202 5.0 4.6 61.9% 68.2% 46.9% 55.2% 41.9% 60.1% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Matthias Bachinger Lukasz Kubot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2007 1491 101.0 +0.72 +0.18 0.889 48.6% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 1–1 — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 1510 107.3 -1.67 -2.28 0.857 46.4% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–2 0–2 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 1521 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1514 104.6 +0.89 +0.01 1.051 50.3% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.09
23 2010 1603 118.6 +1.21 -2.06 1.094 50.3% +49 — — 37.5% -0.13 1–1 0–1 — +0.10 2005 1484 98.6 +2.62 -3.59 0.539 38.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.11
24 2011 1566 125.3 -0.11 -2.05 0.927 48.5% +32 -123 -7 34.3% -0.54 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 96.5 +0.19 2006 1552 111.5 -2.84 -0.81 0.759 45.1% +43 — — 36.7% -1.37 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.02
25 2012 1626 128.2 -0.70 -2.40 0.919 48.7% -8 -10 — 37.5% -0.59 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 101.8 +0.90 2007 1486 99.1 -3.22 -0.28 0.831 45.7% — — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 — — +0.02
26 2013 1610 124.0 -1.35 -2.83 0.776 46.3% +18 +44 — 35.0% -1.20 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 98.9 -0.13 2008 1507 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 1706 123.7 +3.27 +0.19 1.069 51.2% +72 — — 52.9% +0.41 3–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 104.2 -0.19 2009 1730 130.5 -0.39 +0.74 0.974 49.4% -21 -13 — 51.2% -0.07 2–5 (29%) 5–4 (56%) 100.0 -0.34
28 2015 1676 119.3 +0.21 -1.46 0.994 49.5% +73 — — 33.3% -0.33 — 1–4 (20%) — +0.04 2010 1653 134.9 -3.52 +0.17 0.895 48.1% +52 -19 -182 41.7% -0.46 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) 92.0 +0.09
29 2016 1640 112.2 -2.73 -0.24 0.727 43.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.15 2011 1819 141.7 -1.34 -0.12 0.947 49.2% -93 -18 -86 49.0% -0.07 10–7 (59%) 11–7 (61%) 109.1 +0.47
30 2017 1618 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1716 137.7 -1.80 +0.15 0.952 49.5% -31 +48 -3 45.8% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 8–10 (44%) 99.9 +0.63
31 2018 1684 123.9 -0.20 -1.18 0.887 47.8% +35 — — 47.8% -0.57 3–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 105.9 -0.06 2013 1667 126.1 -3.42 -0.55 0.908 48.2% -63 +74 +118 41.1% -0.52 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 96.6 +1.16
32 2019 1649 122.9 -2.25 -1.27 0.879 48.3% +62 -60 — 41.2% -0.59 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.5 -0.59 2014 1670 124.3 -1.32 -2.59 0.827 47.1% -101 +15 +100 40.8% -0.73 1–6 (14%) 3–3 (50%) 95.1 -0.27
33 2020 1605 105.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1698 119.7 -2.83 +2.52 0.866 48.0% -40 — — 42.9% -0.72 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
34 2021 1573 103.0 -1.45 -2.97 0.762 46.9% — — — — — — — — +0.33 2016 1654 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1539 95.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1771 124.6 -0.38 -1.82 0.909 48.4% +33 -22 -7 38.2% -0.57 17–16 (52%) 17–26 (40%) 101.7 +0.85 — 1871 133.5 -2.13 -0.20 0.909 48.4% -30 +7 +8 43.9% -0.40 26–45 (37%) 39–39 (50%) 98.9 +0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.