H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Max Mirnyi vs Jiri Vanek H2H: 1-0
Max Mirnyi holds a 1–0 lead over Jiri Vanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Max Mirnyi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Max Mirnyi won the 2000 Sydney Olympics third round 6-7(4) 6-4 11-9.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2000* | Sydney Olympics | Olympics | R32 | Hard | Max Mirnyi | 6-7(4) 6-4 11-9 | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max Mirnyi | #1,155 | #18 | 1,320 | 1,914 | 221 | 225 | 49.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jiri Vanek | #1,543 | #74 | 796 | 1,646 | 68 | 122 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Max Mirnyi | Jiri Vanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #495 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #74 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #40 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #77 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #35 | 1,866 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #143 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #47 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #115 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #99 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #59 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #101 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #523 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |