H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Max Mirnyi vs Kevin Kim H2H: 2-0
Max Mirnyi holds a 2–0 lead over Kevin Kim in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Max Mirnyi leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Max Mirnyi won the 2006 Moscow third round 6-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2006* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Max Mirnyi | 6-0 (ret.) | Kevin Kim | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2005* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Max Mirnyi | 6-1 7-5 | Kevin Kim | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max Mirnyi | #1,155 | #18 | 1,320 | 1,913 | 216 | 222 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kevin Kim | #1,213 | #63 | 866 | 1,641 | 44 | 97 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Max Mirnyi | Kevin Kim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #35 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #238 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #101 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #101 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #178 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #523 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #117 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #245 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |