H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Max Mirnyi vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo H2H: 1-0
Max Mirnyi holds a 1–0 lead over Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Max Mirnyi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Max Mirnyi won the 2006 Wimbledon first round 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2008 | Barcelona | ATP 500 | Q2 | Clay | Max Mirnyi | 6-4 6-1 | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Max Mirnyi | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 6-3 | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max Mirnyi | #1,155 | #18 | 1,320 | 1,913 | 216 | 222 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Max Mirnyi | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #35 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #47 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #59 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #523 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |