H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Maximilian Marterer vs Aljaz Bedene H2H: 1-1
Maximilian Marterer and Aljaz Bedene are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Aljaz Bedene leads 1–0 on clay, while Maximilian Marterer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Maximilian Marterer won the 2022 Wimbledon first round 4-6 7-5 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 31
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Maximilian Marterer | 4-6 7-5 6-4 7-5 | Aljaz Bedene | Match data |
| Feb 7, 2019* | Cordoba | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Aljaz Bedene | 6-3 6-4 | Maximilian Marterer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximilian Marterer | #740 | #45 | 1,022 | 1,812 | 37 | 78 | 32.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 130 | 159 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maximilian Marterer | Aljaz Bedene | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #176 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #95 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #239 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #209 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #91 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #184 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #739 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |