H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Maximo Gonzalez vs Rogerio Dutra Silva H2H: 0-1
Rogerio Dutra Silva holds a 1–0 lead over Maximo Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rogerio Dutra Silva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rogerio Dutra Silva won the 2012 Santiago third round 0-6 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2012* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Rogerio Dutra Silva | 0-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | Maximo Gonzalez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximo Gonzalez | #467 | #58 | 992 | 1,702 | 28 | 60 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rogerio Dutra Silva | #735 | #63 | 733 | 1,745 | 23 | 59 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maximo Gonzalez | Rogerio Dutra Silva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #121 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #132 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #66 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #141 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #347 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #157 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #150 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #98 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #392 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #101 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #159 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 41 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |