H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Michael Berrer vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Michael Berrer holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Berrer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Berrer won the 2007 US Open first round 6-1 4-6 6-1 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 46
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2013 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Michael Berrer | 6-2 6-3 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2007* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Michael Berrer | 6-1 4-6 6-1 7-6(4) | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Berrer | #952 | #42 | 960 | 1,783 | 88 | 143 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Michael Berrer | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #152 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #74 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #100 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #182 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |