H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Michael Berrer vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0

Michael Berrer holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michael Berrer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Berrer won the 2007 US Open first round 6-1 4-6 6-1 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Berrer
GER Age 46 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Michal Przysiezny
POL Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Berrer #135 6-2 6-3 Michal Przysiezny #208 Match data Jan 14, 2013 Q1 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Michael Berrer #84 6-1 4-6 6-1 7-6(4) Michal Przysiezny #248 Match data Aug 29, 2007* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Berrer #952 #42 960 1,783 88 143 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Michal Przysiezny #1,346 #57 810 1,783 19 59 24.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Berrer Michal Przysiezny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #339 1,478 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #257 1,506 0 0
23 2004 0–1 0.0% #235 1,498 0 0 2007 1–3 25.0% #256 1,540 0 0
24 2005 1–2 33.3% #126 1,526 0 0 2008 0–3 0.0% #609 1,513 0 0
25 2006 4–11 26.7% #152 1,513 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #183 1,516 0 0
26 2007 13–12 52.0% #57 1,672 0 0 2010 1–12 7.7% #86 1,430 0 0
27 2008 8–20 28.6% #131 1,544 0 0 2011 1–4 20.0% #306 1,440 0 0
28 2009 5–8 38.5% #74 1,628 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2010 20–28 41.7% #58 1,682 0 0 2013 10–11 47.6% #66 1,775 0 0
30 2011 17–22 43.6% #100 1,701 0 0 2014 4–18 18.2% #174 1,660 0 0
31 2012 5–11 31.2% #138 1,702 0 0 2015 0–2 0.0% #193 1,667 0 0
32 2013 2–3 40.0% #143 1,619 0 0 2016 0–1 0.0% #428 1,656 0 0
33 2014 3–6 33.3% #128 1,577 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2015 6–10 37.5% #115 1,682 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2016 4–9 30.8% #182 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michael Berrer Michal Przysiezny
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2006 4 7 11 36.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2010 0 6 6 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2008 4 11 15 26.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2011 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2009 4 7 11 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 18 20 38 47.4% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
30 2011 11 15 26 42.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2014 4 11 15 26.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 2012 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2016 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 3 4 7 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 93 159 41.5% 14 32 46 30.4% 7 17 24 29.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — 11 33 44 25.0% 4 18 22 18.2% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Michael Berrer Michal Przysiezny
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 2.0 1.5 57.9% 68.1% 40.4% 47.8% 65.0% 56.8% 33.7%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 2.0 2.0 56.7% 61.0% 53.4% 47.7% 33.8% 57.3% 42.3%
23 2004 1/1 6.0 6.0 67.3% 75.0% 59.5% 83.3% 12.5% 69.9% 30.4% 2007 4/4 6.8 4.8 59.0% 68.4% 40.8% 60.0% 34.4% 56.7% 36.4%
24 2005 3/3 5.3 2.7 62.5% 75.1% 47.4% 38.3% 20.0% 64.3% 28.4% 2008 3/3 5.0 3.0 57.2% 63.7% 44.9% 52.2% 9.5% 55.6% 28.6%
25 2006 15/15 7.3 4.9 60.7% 72.0% 50.6% 46.5% 44.5% 63.8% 34.0% 2009 1/1 9.0 1.0 59.4% 71.9% 56.4% 57.1% 66.7% 65.6% 27.8%
26 2007 25/25 6.6 3.1 62.8% 75.3% 53.0% 64.8% 47.8% 66.9% 34.7% 2010 13/13 7.8 4.9 55.7% 72.2% 44.7% 54.0% 43.2% 60.4% 27.7%
27 2008 28/28 5.0 4.2 62.2% 71.3% 48.5% 63.0% 33.3% 62.6% 32.6% 2011 5/5 6.8 2.8 54.2% 71.1% 53.3% 49.0% 35.0% 63.1% 35.6%
28 2009 13/13 5.3 4.8 66.1% 67.2% 44.5% 56.2% 38.1% 59.1% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 48/48 5.2 2.9 63.8% 71.8% 48.4% 58.2% 48.4% 63.2% 33.7% 2013 21/21 8.5 3.2 59.7% 76.4% 50.5% 60.5% 45.2% 65.7% 31.2%
30 2011 39/39 5.0 2.9 64.1% 70.2% 48.9% 61.9% 36.7% 62.7% 35.2% 2014 22/22 8.3 3.8 60.0% 70.5% 47.5% 54.6% 36.5% 61.3% 31.4%
31 2012 16/16 5.7 2.1 67.9% 65.9% 48.6% 55.4% 30.5% 60.4% 34.2% 2015 2/2 6.5 4.0 52.0% 73.6% 44.1% 47.9% 15.0% 59.2% 29.5%
32 2013 5/5 4.0 3.6 65.1% 66.6% 41.8% 67.3% 38.3% 57.7% 41.6% 2016 1/1 2.0 6.0 48.8% 79.5% 43.9% 75.0% 33.3% 61.3% 29.0%
33 2014 9/9 5.2 2.2 65.3% 69.7% 50.5% 67.3% 56.4% 63.2% 31.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 16/16 9.1 5.3 61.6% 73.3% 47.8% 60.3% 38.4% 63.3% 29.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 13/13 5.0 2.0 68.5% 68.0% 45.1% 55.1% 40.0% 60.9% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 231/231 5.7 3.4 64.0% 70.9% 48.7% 59.4% 40.9% 62.9% 33.9% — 78/78 7.4 3.6 58.1% 71.7% 47.9% 55.5% 39.1% 61.7% 31.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michael Berrer Michal Przysiezny
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1478 104.1 -0.13 -2.62 0.778 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.03
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1507 110.8 +0.85 -1.37 0.993 50.1% — +39 — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.09
23 2004 1499 100.3 -2.11 -0.14 1.009 50.2% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.08 2007 1541 111.9 -0.66 -0.96 0.841 47.0% — +24 — 33.3% -1.42 1–1 0–1 — -0.33
24 2005 1526 108.7 +0.14 -0.27 0.796 46.0% — — — 33.3% -1.50 — — — -0.19 2008 1514 102.9 -0.59 -3.68 0.644 43.1% — +58 — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.18
25 2006 1513 118.6 +1.11 -2.59 0.940 48.7% +37 -67 — 41.9% -0.51 1–8 (11%) 2–7 (22%) 91.1 +0.15 2009 1517 108.0 +0.26 -4.12 0.808 47.3% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.10
26 2007 1673 130.6 +2.81 -0.76 1.048 50.8% -7 — -37 50.8% +0.06 3–4 (43%) 5–6 (45%) 100.0 +0.13 2010 1431 114.5 -2.53 -4.94 0.699 45.0% +3 +75 +146 24.2% -1.30 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 91.5 -0.12
27 2008 1545 124.1 -0.69 -3.10 0.871 48.0% +23 -66 +67 32.8% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 6–6 (50%) 94.2 +1.27 2011 1440 111.8 -1.03 -2.02 0.965 50.0% +12 — — 30.8% -0.61 0–1 1–1 — +0.44
28 2009 1628 128.4 -2.08 +1.27 0.929 48.6% +32 — — 45.7% -0.66 1–3 (25%) 4–4 (50%) 98.0 +0.28 2012 1489 104.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 1683 144.9 +0.52 -2.26 0.916 48.7% +31 -202 — 43.4% -0.38 7–9 (44%) 11–13 (46%) 100.2 -0.18 2013 1776 134.8 +1.94 -2.48 0.909 49.2% -91 — -65 43.6% -0.42 5–3 (63%) 5–6 (45%) 105.3 +0.18
30 2011 1702 133.8 +0.20 -1.21 0.942 48.8% 0 -117 -153 40.9% -0.48 7–2 (78%) 5–7 (42%) 105.9 -0.63 2014 1660 121.7 -1.71 -4.21 0.811 46.8% +17 -131 -26 31.0% -1.26 3–6 (33%) 8–7 (53%) 97.5 +0.21
31 2012 1703 132.9 -1.36 -1.40 0.863 47.4% +51 -96 — 36.6% -0.80 2–6 (25%) 2–6 (25%) 96.0 -0.05 2015 1668 119.8 -0.92 -3.23 0.723 44.6% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.07
32 2013 1619 114.2 -1.90 +0.16 0.984 49.4% — +9 — 55.6% +0.89 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.28 2016 1656 105.5 -4.72 -0.33 0.748 46.3% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.02
33 2014 1577 118.3 -1.12 -1.64 0.851 47.7% +99 — — 37.5% -0.50 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1683 127.9 -0.17 -3.86 0.815 47.5% +39 — — 39.0% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.5 +0.50 2018 1633 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1630 116.0 -1.84 -2.40 0.866 47.8% +71 -116 — 37.5% -0.88 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1784 132.8 +0.02 -1.79 0.914 48.6% +28 -108 -60 41.2% -0.55 31–49 (39%) 43–61 (41%) 94.0 +0.87 — 1783 122.9 -0.54 -3.28 0.825 47.3% -24 +10 +3 31.8% -1.04 9–18 (33%) 16–24 (40%) 93.1 +0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.