H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Michael Berrer vs Rik De Voest H2H: 0-1
Rik De Voest holds a 1–0 lead over Michael Berrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rik De Voest leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rik De Voest won the 2008 Indian Wells Masters first round 7-6(4) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 46
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 46
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2008* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Rik De Voest | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Michael Berrer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Berrer | #952 | #42 | 960 | 1,783 | 88 | 143 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rik De Voest | #1,088 | #110 | 538 | 1,693 | 19 | 38 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Berrer | Rik De Voest | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #207 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #152 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2007 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #74 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #236 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #100 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #126 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2015 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #182 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |