H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Michael Chang vs Alex Corretja H2H: 2-1
Michael Chang holds a 2–1 lead over Alex Corretja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 2002 Hong Kong third round 7-6(6) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2002* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Nov 2, 2000* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Michael Chang | 1-6 7-5 6-0 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1999* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Michael Chang | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-2 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | #1,039 | #2 | 4,065 | 2,110 | 648 | 303 | 68.1% | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 34 |
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Chang | Alex Corretja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #5 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,917 | 1 | 4 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #15 | 2,002 | 1 | 5 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 62–21 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,992 | 1 | 13 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #6 | 2,005 | 1 | 19 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1996 | 63–19 | 76.8% | #2 | 1,985 | 1 | 26 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1997 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #3 | 1,910 | 1 | 31 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1998 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #29 | 1,838 | 1 | 33 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #50 | 1,788 | 1 | 33 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 2000 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,818 | 1 | 34 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #94 | 1,701 | 1 | 34 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #124 | 1,625 | 1 | 34 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 |
| 31 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #383 | 1,551 | 1 | 34 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 |