H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Michael Chang vs David Wheaton H2H: 5-6
David Wheaton holds a 6–5 lead over Michael Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 4–1 on hard courts, while David Wheaton leads 3–1 on carpet. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1994 Paris Masters third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 54
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5
–
6
11 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 1994* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Michael Chang | 7-5 6-4 | David Wheaton | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1994* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Michael Chang | 6-3 6-4 | David Wheaton | Match data |
| Apr 14, 1994* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michael Chang | 6-3 6-3 | David Wheaton | Match data |
| Apr 9, 1994* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Michael Chang | 7-6(3) 6-3 | David Wheaton | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1993* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | David Wheaton | 6-4 6-4 5-7 4-6 6-4 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Jan 22, 1993* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | David Wheaton | 6-4 6-3 1-6 6-3 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Nov 5, 1992* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | David Wheaton | 6-1 1-6 6-3 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Dec 16, 1991* | Grand Slam Cup | ATP Finals | F | Carpet | David Wheaton | 7-5 6-2 6-4 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1991* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | David Wheaton | 6-3 6-3 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Oct 27, 1990* | Stockholm Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Carpet | David Wheaton | 6-7 6-2 6-3 | Michael Chang | Match data |
| Jul 28, 1990* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Michael Chang | 6-0 6-3 | David Wheaton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | #1,039 | #2 | 4,065 | 2,110 | 648 | 303 | 68.1% | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 34 |
| David Wheaton | #874 | #12 | 1,506 | 1,984 | 231 | 190 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Michael Chang | David Wheaton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #5 | 1,971 | 1 | 3 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #785 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,917 | 1 | 4 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #345 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #15 | 2,002 | 1 | 5 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 | 1989 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 62–21 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,992 | 1 | 13 | 1990 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #27 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #6 | 2,005 | 1 | 19 | 1991 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1995 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 23 | 1992 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1996 | 63–19 | 76.8% | #2 | 1,985 | 1 | 26 | 1993 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1997 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #3 | 1,910 | 1 | 31 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #39 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1998 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #29 | 1,838 | 1 | 33 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1999 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #50 | 1,788 | 1 | 33 | 1996 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #131 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2000 | 42–25 | 62.7% | #32 | 1,818 | 1 | 34 | 1997 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #148 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2001 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #94 | 1,701 | 1 | 34 | 1998 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #229 | 1,620 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2002 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #124 | 1,625 | 1 | 34 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,582 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #383 | 1,551 | 1 | 34 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #313 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 |