H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Michael Chang vs Kenneth Carlsen H2H: 8-1

Michael Chang holds a 8–1 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 8–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1998 Boston fourth round 7-5 6-2.

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
8 1
9 main draw meetings
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 28, 1998* Boston ATP 250 R16 Hard Michael Chang #22 7-5 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #67 Match data
Jan 21, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Michael Chang #3 6-3 7-6(2) 5-7 6-3 Kenneth Carlsen #91 Match data
Feb 21, 1997* Memphis ATP 250 R16 Hard Michael Chang #4 6-7(2) 6-2 6-0 Kenneth Carlsen #53 Match data
Jul 20, 1996* Washington ATP 250 SF Hard Michael Chang #5 6-3 6-4 Kenneth Carlsen #73 Match data
Aug 17, 1995* New Haven ATP 250 R32 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #89 7-5 6-4 Michael Chang #5 Match data
Apr 22, 1995* Hong Kong ATP 250 QF Hard Michael Chang #8 6-3 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #84 Match data
Apr 14, 1995* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 R16 Hard Michael Chang #6 6-7(7) 6-3 6-4 Kenneth Carlsen #90 Match data
Feb 4, 1994* San Jose ATP 250 R16 Hard Michael Chang #9 6-3 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #103 Match data
Apr 17, 1993* Hong Kong ATP 250 QF Hard Michael Chang #9 7-6(6) 6-2 Kenneth Carlsen #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Kenneth Carlsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3