H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Marcelo Rios H2H: 6-1

Michael Chang holds a 6–1 lead over Marcelo Rios in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2000 Miami Masters second round 6-4 6-4.

USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 1
7 main draw meetings
CHI Age 50 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 22, 2000* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Marcelo Rios #8 6-4 6-4 Michael Chang #37 Match data
Nov 4, 1999* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Michael Chang #72 7-5 6-2 Marcelo Rios #8 Match data
Sep 5, 1997* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Michael Chang #2 7-5 6-2 4-6 4-6 6-3 Marcelo Rios #10 Match data
Jan 24, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Michael Chang #2 7-5 6-1 6-4 Marcelo Rios #11 Match data
Oct 27, 1996* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 QF Carpet Michael Chang #2 6-4 6-3 Marcelo Rios #10 Match data
Mar 17, 1996* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Michael Chang #5 7-6(6) 6-3 Marcelo Rios #20 Match data
Feb 9, 1995* San Jose ATP 250 R32 Hard Michael Chang #6 6-4 7-5 Marcelo Rios #99 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Marcelo Rios #994 #1 3,719 2,137 366 179 67.2% 0 5 1 0 12 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Marcelo Rios
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1994 12–11 52.2% #107 1,615 0 0
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1995 38–20 65.5% #25 1,769 0 3
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1996 52–25 67.5% #11 1,835 0 4
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1997 54–26 67.5% #10 1,868 0 5
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1998 66–18 78.6% #2 1,948 0 12
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1999 45–16 73.8% #9 1,916 0 15
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 2000 28–19 59.6% #37 1,813 0 16
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 2001 28–19 59.6% #39 1,836 0 18
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 2002 31–19 62.0% #24 1,820 0 18
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 2003 12–6 66.7% #105 1,809 0 18
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34