H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Michael Chang vs Petr Korda H2H: 6-2

Michael Chang holds a 6–2 lead over Petr Korda in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1997 Washington final 5-7 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main draw meetings
Petr Korda
CZE Age 58 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 20, 1997* Washington ATP 250 F Hard Michael Chang #2 5-7 6-2 6-1 Petr Korda #21 Match data
Mar 23, 1996* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Michael Chang #4 6-3 3-6 6-3 Petr Korda #50 Match data
Jul 27, 1995* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Michael Chang #5 7-5 6-1 Petr Korda #43 Match data
Jun 30, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Petr Korda #56 6-4 6-4 6-4 Michael Chang #5 Match data
Mar 7, 1993* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Michael Chang #5 6-1 6-3 Petr Korda #6 Match data
Dec 13, 1992* Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals QF Carpet Michael Chang #6 6-3 6-4 Petr Korda #7 Match data
Nov 3, 1991* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Carpet Michael Chang #21 7-5 6-1 Petr Korda #11 Match data
May 3, 1990* Munich ATP 250 R32 Clay Petr Korda #30 6-7 7-5 7-6 Michael Chang #11 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Petr Korda #1,382 #2 3,499 2,110 378 238 61.4% 1 1 1 0 7 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Petr Korda
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,489 0 0
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 — — — — — — —
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1987 2–1 66.7% #87 1,527 0 0
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1988 6–13 31.6% #188 1,530 0 0
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1989 13–8 61.9% #59 1,690 0 0
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1990 23–26 46.9% #38 1,729 0 0
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1991 44–22 66.7% #9 1,922 0 2
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1992 57–28 67.1% #7 1,940 0 5
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1993 50–23 68.5% #12 1,954 0 6
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1994 33–20 62.3% #18 1,838 0 6
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1995 25–23 52.1% #41 1,801 0 6
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1996 36–17 67.9% #24 1,904 0 7
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 1997 52–24 68.4% #13 1,976 0 8
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 1998 31–20 60.8% #13 1,777 1 10
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 1999 6–12 33.3% #170 1,674 1 10