H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Michael Chang vs Stefan Edberg H2H: 9-12

Stefan Edberg holds a 12–9 lead over Michael Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 21 main-draw meetings, Stefan Edberg leads 9–6 on hard courts, while Michael Chang leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1996 Los Angeles semifinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
9 – 12
21 main draw meetings
Stefan Edberg
SWE Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 3, 1996* Los Angeles ATP 250 SF Hard Michael Chang #3 6-3 6-2 Stefan Edberg #27 Match data
Jun 2, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Stefan Edberg #45 4-6 7-5 6-0 7-6(1) Michael Chang #4 Match data
Mar 14, 1996* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Michael Chang #5 4-6 6-3 6-1 Stefan Edberg #55 Match data
Aug 15, 1994* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 F Hard Michael Chang #6 6-2 7-5 Stefan Edberg #4 Match data
Aug 28, 1993* Long Island ATP 250 SF Hard Michael Chang #7 6-1 6-2 Stefan Edberg #3 Match data
Aug 16, 1993* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 F Hard Michael Chang #7 7-5 0-6 6-4 Stefan Edberg #3 Match data
Sep 13, 1992* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Stefan Edberg #2 6-7(3) 7-5 7-6(3) 5-7 6-4 Michael Chang #4 Match data
Nov 2, 1991* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Michael Chang #21 2-6 6-1 6-4 Stefan Edberg #1 Match data
Oct 12, 1991* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 QF Carpet Stefan Edberg #1 6-2 6-2 Michael Chang #20 Match data
Oct 5, 1991* Sydney Indoor ATP 250 QF Hard Stefan Edberg #1 6-4 7-5 Michael Chang #21 Match data
Sep 4, 1991* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Stefan Edberg #2 7-6(2) 7-5 6-3 Michael Chang #22 Match data
Apr 13, 1991* Tokyo Outdoor ATP 250 SF Hard Stefan Edberg #1 7-5 6-2 Michael Chang #12 Match data
Mar 10, 1991* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Stefan Edberg #1 1-6 6-2 7-5 Michael Chang #13 Match data
Dec 15, 1990* Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals R16 Carpet Michael Chang #15 6-4 4-6 7-5 Stefan Edberg #1 Match data
Aug 12, 1990* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Stefan Edberg #2 3-6 6-3 6-4 Michael Chang #10 Match data
Aug 5, 1990* Los Angeles ATP 250 F Hard Stefan Edberg #2 7-6 2-6 7-6 Michael Chang #11 Match data
Jul 4, 1990* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Stefan Edberg #3 6-3 6-2 6-1 Michael Chang #22 Match data
Jun 12, 1989* Roland Garros Grand Slam F Clay Michael Chang #6 6-1 3-6 4-6 6-4 6-2 Stefan Edberg #3 Match data
Mar 18, 1989* Indian Wells Masters 1000 R16 Hard Michael Chang #25 6-3 6-2 Stefan Edberg #5 Match data
Mar 9, 1989* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard Stefan Edberg #4 6-2 6-4 Michael Chang #24 Match data
Aug 21, 1988* Cincinnati Masters 1000 QF Hard Stefan Edberg #3 6-3 6-3 Michael Chang #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34
Stefan Edberg #1,347 #1 3,997 2,233 744 246 75.2% 6 5 1 0 29 41

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Stefan Edberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 1982 0–3 0.0% — 1,463 0 0
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3 1983 12–10 54.5% #54 1,616 0 0
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4 1984 27–18 60.0% #20 1,823 0 1
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5 1985 58–17 77.3% #5 2,129 1 5
20 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8 1986 66–20 76.7% #5 2,121 1 8
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1987 75–12 86.2% #2 2,206 2 15
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19 1988 54–15 78.3% #5 2,080 3 18
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23 1989 58–16 78.4% #3 2,149 3 20
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26 1990 67–13 83.8% #1 2,172 4 27
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31 1991 73–14 83.9% #1 2,146 5 33
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33 1992 64–19 77.1% #2 2,044 6 36
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33 1993 58–22 72.5% #5 1,986 6 37
28 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34 1994 53–23 69.7% #7 1,854 6 40
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34 1995 35–19 64.8% #23 1,823 6 41
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34 1996 44–25 63.8% #14 1,890 6 41
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 — — — — — — —