H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Michael Chang vs Tim Wilkison H2H: 2-0

Michael Chang holds a 2–0 lead over Tim Wilkison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Chang won the 1989 US Open round of 128 7-5 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Chang
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Tim Wilkison
USA Age 66 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michael Chang #7 7-5 6-3 6-2 Tim Wilkison #102 Match data Aug 30, 1989* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Michael Chang #48 4-6 3-6 6-3 6-4 7-5 Tim Wilkison #88 Match data Sep 4, 1988* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,113 649 305 68.0% 1 7 0 5 21 34
Tim Wilkison #1,167 #23 269 1,897 294 298 49.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Chang Tim Wilkison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,977 1 3 1977 21–27 43.8% #93 1,567 0 0
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,919 1 4 1978 10–13 43.5% #54 1,659 0 1
19 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,003 1 5 1979 26–26 50.0% #69 1,666 0 2
20 1992 58–23 71.6% #6 1,966 1 8 1980 24–25 49.0% #95 1,685 0 2
21 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13 1981 23–24 48.9% #71 1,756 0 3
22 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,006 1 19 1982 28–22 56.0% #61 1,715 0 4
23 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,011 1 23 1983 14–20 41.2% #88 1,683 0 4
24 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,991 1 26 1984 26–20 56.5% #39 1,767 0 5
25 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,911 1 31 1985 36–28 56.2% #44 1,807 0 6
26 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,848 1 33 1986 33–23 58.9% #29 1,772 0 6
27 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,790 1 33 1987 23–20 53.5% #55 1,731 0 6
28 2000 42–26 61.8% #32 1,807 1 34 1988 15–20 42.9% #121 1,673 0 6
29 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,699 1 34 1989 8–16 33.3% #124 1,601 0 6
30 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,624 1 34 1990 7–13 35.0% #210 1,542 0 6
31 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #1178 1,524 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michael Chang Tim Wilkison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 13 8 21 61.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 20 8 28 71.4% 12 2 14 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1977 7 9 16 43.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1990 19 8 27 70.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1978 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1991 24 11 35 68.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1979 10 6 16 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 6 8 14 42.9%
20 1992 40 8 48 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1980 15 10 25 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7%
21 1993 43 10 53 81.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 1981 8 13 21 38.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 5 7 12 41.7%
22 1994 35 10 45 77.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1982 14 4 18 77.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 8 13 38.5%
23 1995 31 10 41 75.6% 14 2 16 87.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 1983 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1996 48 9 57 84.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1984 15 8 23 65.2% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1997 42 9 51 82.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1985 23 11 34 67.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 8 12 33.3%
26 1998 19 9 28 67.9% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1986 14 11 25 56.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 1999 21 17 38 55.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1987 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2000 27 16 43 62.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 12 13 25 48.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
29 2001 11 13 24 45.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2002 5 13 18 27.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1990 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 404 172 576 70.1% 98 52 150 65.3% 30 25 55 54.5% 117 56 173 67.6% — 143 126 269 53.2% 34 39 73 46.6% 73 61 134 54.5% 44 72 116 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michael Chang Tim Wilkison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1559 121.3 — — — — +34 — — 52.2% +0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 1842 146.2 — — — — +2 -249 -283 59.2% +0.61 8–5 (62%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1978 162.9 — — — — -29 -75 -313 68.9% +1.37 8–6 (57%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.14 1977 1567 122.3 — — — — -3 +28 -30 44.0% -0.32 6–6 (50%) 4–8 (33%) — +4.04
18 1990 1920 158.6 — — — — +10 -23 -163 59.6% +0.75 11–6 (65%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.26 1978 1660 119.2 — — — — -158 — +58 42.4% -0.46 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.15
19 1991 2003 160.6 +1.22 +4.46 1.132 52.5% +33 -67 -258 61.4% +0.91 18–7 (72%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.51 1979 1666 141.3 — — — — +26 -130 +55 50.4% +0.12 5–5 (50%) 10–10 (50%) — -1.77
20 1992 1966 166.2 +1.99 +7.08 1.233 54.0% +51 -96 — 65.1% +1.24 16–8 (67%) 8–18 (31%) — -1.65 1980 1685 133.1 — — — — +47 -139 -15 46.2% -0.09 8–4 (67%) 5–6 (45%) — +2.50
21 1993 1992 160.0 +2.60 +5.19 1.207 53.4% +28 -138 -270 66.4% +1.22 23–10 (70%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.44 1981 1756 139.5 — — — — -103 — +46 50.4% -0.15 7–8 (47%) 9–5 (64%) — -1.41
22 1994 2007 157.5 +3.82 +5.50 1.290 54.5% -9 -130 -197 71.3% +1.45 14–8 (64%) 19–7 (73%) — +0.39 1982 1716 131.5 — — — — +37 -178 +17 52.5% +0.20 12–3 (80%) 9–8 (53%) — +2.66
23 1995 2011 165.8 +4.79 +5.90 1.302 54.6% +1 +38 — 70.0% +1.41 16–5 (76%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.91 1983 1683 139.3 — — — — +39 — -5 42.2% -0.40 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) — -2.94
24 1996 1992 167.8 +3.39 +6.79 1.284 54.8% +58 -22 — 70.3% +1.62 16–3 (84%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.94 1984 1767 141.4 — — — — -9 -95 -134 54.5% +0.71 8–5 (62%) 5–11 (31%) — +1.11
25 1997 1911 157.1 +2.72 +5.34 1.224 53.9% +68 +21 -176 66.3% +1.37 17–7 (71%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.71 1985 1807 144.0 — — — — -6 -169 -99 56.4% +0.46 9–13 (41%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.48
26 1998 1849 144.8 +1.95 +2.83 1.163 52.9% +24 +87 — 65.1% +1.02 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — +2.82 1986 1773 145.5 — — — — +8 -113 -1 55.6% +0.64 10–5 (67%) 12–10 (55%) — -0.92
27 1999 1791 141.4 +0.54 +2.18 1.090 51.5% +20 +46 — 54.0% +0.38 9–9 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.91 1987 1731 138.2 — — — — 0 — +53 50.9% +0.10 12–7 (63%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.49
28 2000 1807 140.0 -0.26 +3.59 1.080 51.7% -11 -12 -72 56.2% +0.47 15–9 (63%) 13–10 (57%) — +0.86 1988 1673 129.9 — — — — +18 — +13 44.2% -0.22 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.05
29 2001 1699 128.0 -1.43 +1.98 1.006 49.8% -10 +24 -7 44.9% -0.13 4–4 (50%) 3–9 (25%) — +0.59 1989 1602 130.6 — — — — -14 +67 +72 33.9% -0.84 1–3 (25%) 3–5 (38%) — -1.68
30 2002 1624 130.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.882 48.0% +20 +41 +34 35.3% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.72 1990 1542 110.3 — — — — -17 +146 +113 34.0% -0.92 1–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.59
31 2003 1551 127.1 -0.91 -1.10 0.800 46.1% +26 — — 24.1% -1.59 0–2 0–1 — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1525 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.17
Career — 2114 161.6 +2.11 +4.69 1.178 53.1% +21 -33 -160 62.8% +0.99 188–106 (64%) 147–149 (50%) 98.2 -0.36 — 1897 141.4 — — — — -1 -64 +12 48.8% +0.03 94–75 (56%) 97–101 (49%) 104.5 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.