H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Michael Llodra vs Kevin Kim H2H: 1-1

Michael Llodra and Kevin Kim are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kevin Kim won the 2009 Miami Open first round 3-6 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Michael Llodra
FRA Age 46 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Kevin Kim
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kevin Kim #107 3-6 (ret.) Michael Llodra #82 Match data Mar 27, 2009* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Michael Llodra #101 6-4 6-4 Kevin Kim #182 Match data Jul 25, 2002* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Michael Llodra #631 #21 1,575 1,902 183 216 45.9% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Kevin Kim #1,213 #63 866 1,642 44 97 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Michael Llodra Kevin Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
20 2000 5–7 41.7% #159 1,597 0 0 1999 0–2 0.0% #195 1,468 0 0
21 2001 6–11 35.3% #89 1,601 0 0 2000 2–5 28.6% #141 1,424 0 0
22 2002 12–17 41.4% #104 1,619 0 0 2001 1–3 25.0% #184 1,392 0 0
23 2003 2–10 16.7% #173 1,590 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #238 1,430 0 0
24 2004 20–12 62.5% #41 1,732 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #219 1,453 0 0
25 2005 10–20 33.3% #136 1,625 0 1 2004 2–3 40.0% #94 1,550 0 0
26 2006 4–8 33.3% #96 1,608 0 1 2005 19–25 43.2% #101 1,561 0 0
27 2007 13–18 41.9% #93 1,641 0 1 2006 7–18 28.0% #101 1,546 0 0
28 2008 22–20 52.4% #40 1,731 0 3 2007 3–14 17.6% #178 1,483 0 0
29 2009 17–16 51.5% #67 1,741 0 3 2008 0–3 0.0% #117 1,516 0 0
30 2010 27–21 56.2% #23 1,881 0 5 2009 7–16 30.4% #117 1,598 0 0
31 2011 17–21 44.7% #47 1,776 0 5 2010 1–3 25.0% #245 1,581 0 0
32 2012 12–14 46.2% #53 1,844 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2013 12–15 44.4% #105 1,808 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2014 4–6 40.0% #269 1,698 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Michael Llodra Kevin Kim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2003 0 7 7 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 9 7 16 56.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2005 5 9 14 35.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2006 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2005 15 17 32 46.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2007 7 11 18 38.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2006 6 11 17 35.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 3 11 14 21.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2009 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 2009 4 11 15 26.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
31 2011 9 15 24 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2012 11 8 19 57.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 133 242 45.0% 20 37 57 35.1% 44 30 74 59.5% 10 16 26 38.5% — 36 68 104 34.6% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 381/399 of Michael Llodra's and 122/122 of Kevin Kim's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Michael Llodra Kevin Kim
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2000 11/12 7.0 5.4 55.8% 74.2% 49.8% 51.0% 43.0% 63.8% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 12/17 6.9 6.0 58.9% 69.2% 48.7% 51.2% 42.0% 60.8% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 21/29 7.1 4.8 60.1% 75.3% 45.0% 49.2% 42.4% 63.4% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2003 12/12 8.6 5.0 60.6% 68.2% 46.2% 60.6% 28.3% 59.2% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 32/32 6.2 2.3 65.1% 75.9% 54.2% 69.7% 41.2% 68.4% 38.7% 2003 1/1 7.0 1.0 66.2% 68.9% 52.2% 0.0% 20.0% 63.2% 37.1%
25 2005 30/30 5.8 2.4 64.8% 70.1% 50.5% 58.0% 42.5% 63.1% 31.6% 2004 5/5 3.6 1.4 61.4% 66.2% 47.8% 59.8% 47.0% 59.1% 37.1%
26 2006 12/12 7.8 1.9 62.3% 70.8% 47.5% 44.9% 33.4% 62.4% 36.9% 2005 44/44 6.5 3.0 60.0% 70.8% 46.9% 60.9% 41.2% 61.3% 35.8%
27 2007 31/31 7.4 3.4 62.9% 72.6% 53.4% 65.0% 37.6% 65.4% 35.3% 2006 25/25 3.3 3.6 57.7% 66.7% 48.8% 48.4% 41.2% 59.3% 35.9%
28 2008 40/42 9.3 3.4 60.4% 73.5% 54.2% 66.1% 37.6% 65.9% 33.1% 2007 17/17 3.6 2.9 61.0% 68.4% 39.1% 41.4% 29.0% 57.0% 34.0%
29 2009 33/33 9.1 2.6 63.3% 77.3% 53.3% 63.8% 41.8% 68.4% 34.3% 2008 3/3 6.3 5.0 47.9% 69.6% 49.2% 71.6% 27.8% 59.6% 32.5%
30 2010 48/48 9.1 3.1 62.4% 76.1% 51.5% 63.3% 50.3% 66.9% 34.2% 2009 23/23 4.7 4.6 54.2% 71.5% 41.1% 48.2% 39.7% 57.5% 32.6%
31 2011 38/38 7.2 3.3 62.4% 73.7% 51.0% 64.3% 30.8% 65.2% 32.7% 2010 4/4 3.5 4.3 53.7% 72.6% 43.1% 61.9% 12.1% 59.0% 33.9%
32 2012 26/26 8.4 2.4 63.5% 73.4% 52.5% 59.8% 32.6% 65.6% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 25/27 7.6 3.3 61.3% 75.3% 53.0% 53.8% 43.7% 66.3% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 10/10 6.4 1.8 68.9% 70.3% 49.8% 53.7% 30.0% 64.0% 33.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Michael Llodra Kevin Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1486 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — +0.03
20 2000 1598 127.1 +0.78 +0.37 1.028 50.1% -44 — +71 38.7% -0.39 2–1 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.08 1999 1469 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.20 — — — -0.04
21 2001 1601 121.3 -0.66 -1.24 0.903 48.1% -29 -103 +64 41.5% -0.51 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.02 2000 1425 106.2 — — — — +31 — — 36.8% -1.00 1–3 (25%) — — +0.39
22 2002 1619 130.3 +1.08 -0.25 1.013 50.6% -10 -111 +6 44.4% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.43 2001 1392 103.2 — — — — +58 — — 33.3% -0.89 0–1 — — +0.28
23 2003 1590 113.0 -0.96 -3.38 0.786 45.9% -53 — — 33.3% -1.30 0–6 (0%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.20 2002 1430 106.3 — — — — +23 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.20
24 2004 1733 139.9 +4.02 +2.13 1.223 53.3% -62 -149 +32 63.0% +1.00 1–3 (25%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.92 2003 1453 101.1 -1.94 -2.05 1.009 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08
25 2005 1625 132.1 +0.29 -3.47 0.857 47.8% +4 -99 +170 35.1% -0.60 7–5 (58%) 4–11 (27%) — -0.74 2004 1550 107.7 -1.03 +1.02 0.909 47.9% -39 — — 36.4% -1.18 — — — -0.18
26 2006 1609 120.1 +0.77 -0.43 0.981 49.5% -12 -86 — 35.7% -0.29 2–2 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.12 2005 1562 124.4 -1.57 -1.25 0.924 48.7% +17 -35 -52 44.2% -0.30 7–7 (50%) 8–14 (36%) — +1.98
27 2007 1641 132.2 +1.45 -1.19 1.018 50.2% -30 -51 +115 44.7% -0.28 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.22 2006 1546 126.0 -2.01 -0.63 0.882 47.5% -14 +9 — 34.9% -0.95 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.13
28 2008 1731 142.8 +2.39 -1.86 0.973 49.3% -31 -60 +34 55.0% +0.08 5–6 (45%) 23–15 (61%) — -1.31 2007 1484 113.2 -4.48 -1.97 0.789 45.2% +39 — — 23.8% -1.50 2–2 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.68
29 2009 1741 139.4 +3.47 -1.08 1.087 51.3% +1 — +41 48.6% -0.10 5–2 (71%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.08 2008 1517 103.8 -0.92 +0.78 0.805 46.6% — — — 12.5% -1.38 — — — -0.04
30 2010 1881 147.2 +3.24 -1.57 1.032 50.8% -56 -189 +40 58.3% +0.38 3–5 (38%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.02 2009 1599 124.8 -3.91 -1.54 0.767 45.5% +20 -104 -33 25.5% -1.45 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.72
31 2011 1777 149.5 +1.94 -2.27 0.938 49.2% -37 -84 +194 47.8% -0.17 5–4 (56%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.28 2010 1581 108.5 -1.08 -1.69 0.826 46.6% +31 — — 25.0% -1.38 — 0–1 — +0.11
32 2012 1844 157.9 +2.15 -1.12 0.948 48.9% +43 -156 — 46.3% -0.30 3–2 (60%) 10–4 (71%) — -2.17 2011 1553 102.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 1809 148.4 +2.33 -0.44 1.061 50.8% +25 — +52 52.5% +0.05 0–6 (0%) 7–3 (70%) — -1.76 2012 1546 104.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 1699 117.2 -0.35 -1.74 0.922 48.9% +10 +3 — 42.9% -0.33 — 2–3 (40%) — +0.81 2013 1535 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1903 146.8 +1.98 -1.22 0.996 50.0% -20 -99 +73 48.2% -0.09 42–57 (42%) 100–102 (50%) 99.1 -1.25 — 1642 118.6 -2.46 -1.16 0.859 47.2% +15 -38 -43 34.1% -0.93 14–21 (40%) 11–27 (29%) 90.4 +2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.